PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OILU vs. PYLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OILU vs. PYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors Oil & Gas Exploration & Production 3X Leveraged ETN (OILU) and PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OILU achieves a 95.09% return, which is significantly higher than PYLD's 0.83% return.


OILU

1D
3.79%
1M
38.67%
6M
37.11%
YTD
95.09%
1Y
107.91%
3Y*
1.15%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
13.25%

PYLD

1D
-0.19%
1M
-0.91%
6M
0.19%
YTD
0.83%
1Y
4.78%
3Y*
7.74%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
7.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$8.21M$8.45M$7.94M
$85.99M$101.13M$105.82M

OILU vs. PYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between OILU and PYLD is -0.31, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

-0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2023

-0.05

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between OILU and PYLD has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.05 to -0.31, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OILU vs. PYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

OILU
OILU Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
OILU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OILU Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
OILU Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
OILU Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
OILU Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

PYLD
PYLD Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
PYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
PYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
PYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
PYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

OILU vs. PYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors Oil & Gas Exploration & Production 3X Leveraged ETN (OILU) and PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


OILUPYLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.32

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.07

1.65

+0.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.11

7.13

-2.02

OILU vs. PYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OILU Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is comparable to the PYLD Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OILU and PYLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

OILU vs. PYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OILU drawdown since its inception was -81.00%, which is greater than PYLD's maximum drawdown of -4.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OILU and PYLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OILUPYLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.00%

-4.52%

-76.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-46.49%

-3.25%

-43.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-69.09%

-3.88%

-65.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-47.53%

-1.13%

-46.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-50.69%

-0.64%

-50.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.88%

0.75%

+18.13%

Volatility

OILU vs. PYLD - Volatility Comparison

MicroSectors Oil & Gas Exploration & Production 3X Leveraged ETN (OILU) has a higher volatility of 19.22% compared to PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PYLD) at 0.88%. This indicates that OILU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OILUPYLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.22%

0.88%

+18.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

51.99%

2.73%

+49.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

64.36%

3.11%

+61.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

80.80%

3.96%

+76.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

80.80%

3.96%

+76.84%

OILU vs. PYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

OILU has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than PYLD's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

OILU vs. PYLD - Dividend Comparison

OILU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.37%.


Frequently Asked Questions


OILU and PYLD have a correlation of -0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OILU has higher volatility (19.22%) compared to PYLD (0.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OILU dropped -81.00% vs PYLD's -4.52%.

On 3-year performance, PYLD leads with 7.74% vs 1.15% for OILU. On fees, PYLD is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, PYLD has been the lower-risk option at 0.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, PYLD has performed better with a 7.74% return vs 1.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PYLD is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for OILU.

PYLD has the higher dividend yield at 5.88%, compared with 0.00% for OILU.

OILU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while PYLD is Multisector Bonds. They also come from different issuers: BMO and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for OILU and 0.55% for PYLD.

PYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OILU and PYLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer