OILU vs. GLDW
OILU (MicroSectors Oil & Gas Exploration & Production 3X Leveraged ETN) and GLDW (Roundhill Gold WeeklyPay ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - OILU is a Leveraged Commodities fund managed by BMO, while GLDW is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by State Street. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. OILU charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for GLDW.
Performance
OILU vs. GLDW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OILU achieves a 96.53% return, which is significantly higher than GLDW's 1.00% return.
OILU
- 1D
- 3.64%
- 1M
- -10.84%
- YTD
- 96.53%
- 6M
- 77.49%
- 1Y
- 115.83%
- 3Y*
- 10.60%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GLDW
- 1D
- -1.20%
- 1M
- -2.48%
- YTD
- 1.00%
- 6M
- 3.47%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OILU vs. GLDW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
OILU MicroSectors Oil & Gas Exploration & Production 3X Leveraged ETN | 96.53% | 4.81% |
GLDW Roundhill Gold WeeklyPay ETF | 1.00% | 7.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between OILU and GLDW is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2025 | 0.03 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OILU vs. GLDW — Risk / Return Rank
OILU
GLDW
OILU vs. GLDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors Oil & Gas Exploration & Production 3X Leveraged ETN (OILU) and Roundhill Gold WeeklyPay ETF (GLDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| OILU | GLDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.48 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.74 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OILU | GLDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.87 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.17 | 0.42 | -0.25 |
Drawdowns
OILU vs. GLDW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OILU drawdown since its inception was -81.00%, which is greater than GLDW's maximum drawdown of -23.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OILU and GLDW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OILU | GLDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.00% | -23.59% | -57.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.51% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -69.09% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -47.14% | -22.51% | -24.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -50.59% | -8.93% | -41.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.32% | — | — |
Volatility
OILU vs. GLDW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OILU | GLDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 25.14% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 49.94% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 62.23% | 36.90% | +25.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 81.16% | 36.90% | +44.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 81.16% | 36.90% | +44.26% |
OILU vs. GLDW - Expense Ratio Comparison
OILU has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than GLDW's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
OILU vs. GLDW - Dividend Comparison
OILU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GLDW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.48%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
GLDW Roundhill Gold WeeklyPay ETF | 19.48% | 3.75% |
OILU MicroSectors Oil & Gas Exploration & Production 3X Leveraged ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OILU and GLDW have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, OILU is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
OILU is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for GLDW.
GLDW has the higher dividend yield at 19.48%, compared with 0.00% for OILU.
OILU is categorized as Leveraged Commodities, while GLDW is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: BMO and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for OILU and 0.99% for GLDW.
Find the right allocation for OILU and GLDW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer