PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OILU vs. DBE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OILU vs. DBE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors Oil & Gas Exploration & Production 3X Leveraged ETN (OILU) and Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OILU achieves a 96.53% return, which is significantly higher than DBE's 83.68% return.


OILU

1D
3.64%
1M
-10.84%
YTD
96.53%
6M
77.49%
1Y
115.83%
3Y*
10.60%
5Y*
10Y*

DBE

1D
2.33%
1M
-5.45%
YTD
83.68%
6M
74.95%
1Y
84.41%
3Y*
23.42%
5Y*
19.66%
10Y*
12.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OILU vs. DBE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
OILU
MicroSectors Oil & Gas Exploration & Production 3X Leveraged ETN
96.53%-16.50%-21.65%-32.50%151.08%-17.87%
DBE
Invesco DB Energy Fund
83.68%-2.17%2.96%-12.14%33.77%-7.22%

Correlation

The correlation between OILU and DBE is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2021

0.65

The correlation between OILU and DBE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OILU vs. DBE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OILU
OILU Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
OILU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OILU Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
OILU Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
OILU Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
OILU Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

DBE
DBE Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
DBE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBE Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
DBE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBE Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OILU vs. DBE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors Oil & Gas Exploration & Production 3X Leveraged ETN (OILU) and Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


OILUDBEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.40

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.48

5.89

-2.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.74

11.53

-2.79

OILU vs. DBE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OILU Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is comparable to the DBE Sharpe Ratio of 2.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OILU and DBE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


OILUDBEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.87

2.43

-0.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.17

0.09

+0.07

Drawdowns

OILU vs. DBE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OILU drawdown since its inception was -81.00%, smaller than the maximum DBE drawdown of -86.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OILU and DBE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OILUDBEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.00%

-86.69%

+5.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.51%

-14.41%

-19.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-69.09%

-23.89%

-45.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-60.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-47.14%

-30.27%

-16.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-50.59%

-57.31%

+6.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.32%

7.35%

+5.97%

Volatility

OILU vs. DBE - Volatility Comparison

MicroSectors Oil & Gas Exploration & Production 3X Leveraged ETN (OILU) has a higher volatility of 25.14% compared to Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE) at 12.95%. This indicates that OILU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OILUDBEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

25.14%

12.95%

+12.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

49.94%

30.86%

+19.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

62.23%

34.97%

+27.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

81.16%

29.39%

+51.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

81.16%

28.33%

+52.83%

OILU vs. DBE - Expense Ratio Comparison

OILU has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than DBE's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

OILU vs. DBE - Dividend Comparison

OILU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DBE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.10%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
DBE
Invesco DB Energy Fund
2.10%3.86%6.32%3.87%0.75%0.00%0.00%1.79%1.67%
OILU
MicroSectors Oil & Gas Exploration & Production 3X Leveraged ETN
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


OILU and DBE have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OILU has higher volatility (25.14%) compared to DBE (12.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OILU dropped -81.00% vs DBE's -86.69%.

On 3-year performance, DBE leads with 23.42% vs 10.60% for OILU. On fees, DBE is cheaper at 0.78% per year. On volatility, DBE has been the lower-risk option at 12.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, DBE has performed better with a 23.42% return vs 10.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DBE is cheaper with a 0.78% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for OILU.

DBE has the higher dividend yield at 2.10%, compared with 0.00% for OILU.

OILU is categorized as Leveraged Commodities, while DBE is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: BMO and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for OILU and 0.78% for DBE.

DBE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 1.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OILU and DBE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer