OILT vs. POW
OILT (Texas Capital Texas Oil Index ETF) and POW (VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - OILT is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Alerian Texas Weighted Oil and Gas Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while POW is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by VistaShares. OILT is passively managed, while POW is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.16, they often move in opposite directions. OILT charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for POW.
Performance
OILT vs. POW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OILT achieves a 26.02% return, which is significantly lower than POW's 41.57% return.
OILT
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- -3.37%
- 6M
- 23.34%
- YTD
- 26.02%
- 1Y
- 29.87%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
POW
- 1D
- 1.90%
- 1M
- -7.03%
- 6M
- 34.18%
- YTD
- 41.57%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OILT vs. POW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
OILT Texas Capital Texas Oil Index ETF | 26.02% | 4.64% |
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF | 41.57% | -1.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between OILT and POW is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025 | -0.16 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OILT vs. POW — Risk / Return Rank
OILT
POW
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
OILT vs. POW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Texas Capital Texas Oil Index ETF (OILT) and VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| OILT | POW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.45 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.96 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
OILT vs. POW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OILT drawdown since its inception was -35.21%, which is greater than POW's maximum drawdown of -18.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OILT and POW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OILT | POW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.21% | -18.37% | -16.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.72% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.95% | -16.82% | +1.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.04% | -4.40% | -8.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.58% | — | — |
Volatility
OILT vs. POW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OILT | POW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.20% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.29% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.93% | 32.91% | -4.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.73% | 32.91% | -4.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.73% | 32.91% | -4.18% |
OILT vs. POW - Expense Ratio Comparison
OILT has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than POW's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
OILT vs. POW - Dividend Comparison
OILT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.72%, more than POW's 0.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
OILT Texas Capital Texas Oil Index ETF | 2.72% | 3.12% | 2.63% |
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF | 0.14% | 0.19% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OILT and POW have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, OILT is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
OILT is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for POW.
OILT has the higher dividend yield at 2.72%, compared with 0.14% for POW.
OILT is categorized as Energy Equities, while POW is Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: Texas Capital and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for OILT and 0.75% for POW.
Find the right allocation for OILT and POW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer