PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
OILT vs. CHIN.DE
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between OILT and CHIN.DE is 0.22, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.2

Performance

OILT vs. CHIN.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Texas Capital Texas Oil Index ETF (OILT) and KraneShares ICBCCS China S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CHIN.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-3.66%
16.26%
OILT
CHIN.DE

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

OILT:

0.33

CHIN.DE:

1.16

Sortino Ratio

OILT:

0.59

CHIN.DE:

1.84

Omega Ratio

OILT:

1.07

CHIN.DE:

1.26

Calmar Ratio

OILT:

0.35

CHIN.DE:

1.72

Martin Ratio

OILT:

0.67

CHIN.DE:

3.14

Ulcer Index

OILT:

10.70%

CHIN.DE:

9.74%

Daily Std Dev

OILT:

21.84%

CHIN.DE:

26.44%

Max Drawdown

OILT:

-20.45%

CHIN.DE:

-17.74%

Current Drawdown

OILT:

-13.55%

CHIN.DE:

-9.77%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OILT achieves a 2.08% return, which is significantly lower than CHIN.DE's 3.50% return.


OILT

YTD

2.08%

1M

-6.50%

6M

-3.66%

1Y

2.91%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

CHIN.DE

YTD

3.50%

1M

5.33%

6M

24.39%

1Y

28.17%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


OILT vs. CHIN.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

OILT has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than CHIN.DE's 0.55% expense ratio.


CHIN.DE
KraneShares ICBCCS China S&P 500 UCITS ETF
Expense ratio chart for CHIN.DE: current value at 0.55% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.55%
Expense ratio chart for OILT: current value at 0.35% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.35%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

OILT vs. CHIN.DE — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OILT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of OILT is 1313
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of OILT is 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of OILT is 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of OILT is 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of OILT is 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of OILT is 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

CHIN.DE
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CHIN.DE is 4747
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CHIN.DE is 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CHIN.DE is 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CHIN.DE is 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CHIN.DE is 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CHIN.DE is 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

OILT vs. CHIN.DE - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Texas Capital Texas Oil Index ETF (OILT) and KraneShares ICBCCS China S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CHIN.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for OILT, currently valued at 0.11, compared to the broader market0.002.004.000.110.76
The chart of Sortino ratio for OILT, currently valued at 0.29, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.000.291.31
The chart of Omega ratio for OILT, currently valued at 1.04, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.041.18
The chart of Calmar ratio for OILT, currently valued at 0.11, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.000.110.91
The chart of Martin ratio for OILT, currently valued at 0.21, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.000.211.83
OILT
CHIN.DE

The current OILT Sharpe Ratio is 0.33, which is lower than the CHIN.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OILT and CHIN.DE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.200.000.200.400.600.801.00Dec 15Dec 22Dec 29Jan 05Jan 12Jan 19Jan 26Feb 02Feb 09
0.11
0.76
OILT
CHIN.DE

Dividends

OILT vs. CHIN.DE - Dividend Comparison

OILT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.58%, while CHIN.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM2024
OILT
Texas Capital Texas Oil Index ETF
2.58%2.63%
CHIN.DE
KraneShares ICBCCS China S&P 500 UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

OILT vs. CHIN.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OILT drawdown since its inception was -20.45%, which is greater than CHIN.DE's maximum drawdown of -17.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OILT and CHIN.DE. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-13.55%
-14.82%
OILT
CHIN.DE

Volatility

OILT vs. CHIN.DE - Volatility Comparison

Texas Capital Texas Oil Index ETF (OILT) has a higher volatility of 6.85% compared to KraneShares ICBCCS China S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CHIN.DE) at 5.22%. This indicates that OILT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CHIN.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
6.85%
5.22%
OILT
CHIN.DE
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab