PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OILK vs. FDLO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OILK vs. FDLO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK) and Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF (FDLO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OILK achieves a 64.22% return, which is significantly higher than FDLO's 5.00% return.


OILK

1D
1.40%
1M
-1.65%
YTD
64.22%
6M
60.70%
1Y
58.99%
3Y*
19.03%
5Y*
17.73%
10Y*

FDLO

1D
-0.85%
1M
1.29%
YTD
5.00%
6M
4.24%
1Y
15.16%
3Y*
14.30%
5Y*
10.12%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OILK vs. FDLO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
OILK
ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF
64.22%-11.86%8.18%-0.97%27.57%63.71%-61.09%30.48%-20.40%2.82%
FDLO
Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF
5.00%11.77%16.06%16.38%-10.38%24.00%12.19%31.10%-0.26%20.44%

Correlation

The correlation between OILK and FDLO is -0.24, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2016

0.14

The correlation between OILK and FDLO shifts across timeframes, from -0.24 (1 year) to 0.14 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

OILK vs. FDLO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
OILK
FDLO

Consumer Cyclical

100.0%
10.2%

Basic Materials

-

1.7%

Communication Services

-

10.8%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.7%

Energy

-

3.4%

Financial Services

-

12.5%

Healthcare

-

9.5%

Industrials

-

9.1%

Real Estate

-

2.3%

Technology

-

33.1%

Utilities

-

2.3%

Consumer Cyclical

OILK
100.0%
FDLO
10.2%

Basic Materials

OILK

-

FDLO
1.7%

Communication Services

OILK

-

FDLO
10.8%

Consumer Defensive

OILK

-

FDLO
4.7%

Energy

OILK

-

FDLO
3.4%

Financial Services

OILK

-

FDLO
12.5%

Healthcare

OILK

-

FDLO
9.5%

Industrials

OILK

-

FDLO
9.1%

Real Estate

OILK

-

FDLO
2.3%

Technology

OILK

-

FDLO
33.1%

Utilities

OILK

-

FDLO
2.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OILK vs. FDLO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OILK
OILK Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
OILK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OILK Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
OILK Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
OILK Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
OILK Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

FDLO
FDLO Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
FDLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDLO Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
FDLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDLO Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OILK vs. FDLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK) and Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF (FDLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


OILKFDLODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.06

1.74

+0.32

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.59

2.48

+0.11

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.31

+0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.42

2.13

+1.28

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.91

9.30

-2.39

OILK vs. FDLO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OILK Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is comparable to the FDLO Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OILK and FDLO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


OILKFDLODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.06

1.74

+0.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

0.78

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.12

0.83

-0.71

Drawdowns

OILK vs. FDLO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OILK drawdown since its inception was -83.76%, which is greater than FDLO's maximum drawdown of -34.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OILK and FDLO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OILKFDLODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-83.76%

-34.35%

-49.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.35%

-7.13%

-10.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.42%

-13.68%

-9.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.69%

-19.23%

-15.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.66%

-0.91%

-2.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.61%

-3.38%

-29.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.56%

1.63%

+6.93%

Volatility

OILK vs. FDLO - Volatility Comparison

ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK) has a higher volatility of 10.44% compared to Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF (FDLO) at 1.91%. This indicates that OILK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDLO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OILKFDLODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.44%

1.91%

+8.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.26%

6.41%

+16.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.75%

8.75%

+20.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.12%

13.07%

+17.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.97%

15.50%

+20.47%

OILK vs. FDLO - Expense Ratio Comparison

OILK has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than FDLO's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

OILK vs. FDLO - Dividend Comparison

OILK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.18%, more than FDLO's 1.36% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FDLO
Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF
1.36%1.37%1.40%1.35%1.49%1.11%1.38%1.55%1.76%1.61%0.55%
OILK
ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF
8.18%4.79%3.11%5.80%17.32%68.82%0.13%0.94%0.58%6.17%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


OILK and FDLO have a correlation of -0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OILK has higher volatility (10.44%) compared to FDLO (1.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OILK dropped -83.76% vs FDLO's -34.35%.

On 5-year performance, OILK leads with 17.73% vs 10.12% for FDLO. On fees, FDLO is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, FDLO has been the lower-risk option at 1.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, OILK has performed better with a 17.73% return vs 10.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FDLO is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for OILK.

OILK has the higher dividend yield at 8.18%, compared with 1.36% for FDLO.

OILK is categorized as Oil & Gas, while FDLO is Volatility Hedged Equity. OILK tracks Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index, while FDLO tracks Fidelity U.S. Low Volatility Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for OILK and 0.29% for FDLO.

OILK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OILK and FDLO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer