OILK vs. CL=F
Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK) and Crude Oil WTI (CL=F).
OILK is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index. It was launched on Sep 26, 2016.
Performance
OILK vs. CL=F - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
OILK vs. CL=F - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF | 42.24% | -11.86% | 8.18% | -0.97% | 27.57% | 63.71% | -61.09% | 30.48% | -20.40% | 2.82% |
CL=F Crude Oil WTI | 72.26% | -19.41% | -0.82% | -10.70% | 7.44% | 53.98% | -19.98% | 32.92% | -24.35% | 12.51% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OILK achieves a 42.24% return, which is significantly lower than CL=F's 72.26% return.
OILK
- 1D
- -2.66%
- 1M
- 17.31%
- YTD
- 42.24%
- 6M
- 33.80%
- 1Y
- 25.27%
- 3Y*
- 12.28%
- 5Y*
- 17.11%
- 10Y*
- —
CL=F
- 1D
- -2.44%
- 1M
- 38.86%
- YTD
- 72.26%
- 6M
- 60.10%
- 1Y
- 38.92%
- 3Y*
- 9.28%
- 5Y*
- 9.98%
- 10Y*
- 10.40%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OILK vs. CL=F — Risk / Return Rank
OILK
CL=F
OILK vs. CL=F - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK) and Crude Oil WTI (CL=F). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| OILK | CL=F | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.87 | 0.83 | +0.04 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.31 | 1.35 | -0.03 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.18 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.45 | 2.08 | -0.63 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.56 | 3.45 | -0.90 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OILK | CL=F | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 | 0.83 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 | 0.26 | +0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.20 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.07 | 0.07 | +0.01 |
Correlation
The correlation between OILK and CL=F is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Drawdowns
OILK vs. CL=F - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OILK drawdown since its inception was -83.76%, smaller than the maximum CL=F drawdown of -92.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OILK and CL=F.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| OILK | CL=F | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.76% | -92.04% | +8.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.35% | -27.07% | +9.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.69% | -53.86% | +19.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -84.82% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.38% | -31.92% | +17.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.08% | -40.84% | +7.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.87% | 16.32% | -6.45% |
Volatility
OILK vs. CL=F - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK) is 12.71%, while Crude Oil WTI (CL=F) has a volatility of 27.34%. This indicates that OILK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CL=F based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| OILK | CL=F | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.71% | 27.34% | -14.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.40% | 33.40% | -13.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.06% | 41.12% | -12.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.85% | 36.54% | -6.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.00% | 48.71% | -12.71% |