OGIG vs. OUSA
OGIG (O’Shares Global Internet Giants ETF) and OUSA (OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - OGIG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the O’Shares Global Internet Giants Index, while OUSA is a Quality Factor fund tracking the O'Shares US Quality Dividend Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, OGIG returned -2.57%/yr vs 8.96%/yr for OUSA. Their 0.53 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. Both charge a 0.48% expense ratio.
Performance
OGIG vs. OUSA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OGIG achieves a -8.22% return, which is significantly lower than OUSA's 7.09% return.
OGIG
- 1D
- 3.19%
- 1M
- 4.98%
- 6M
- 1.25%
- YTD
- -8.22%
- 1Y
- -8.96%
- 3Y*
- 13.89%
- 5Y*
- -2.57%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 8.27%
OUSA
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- 2.40%
- 6M
- 3.84%
- YTD
- 7.09%
- 1Y
- 16.21%
- 3Y*
- 13.56%
- 5Y*
- 8.96%
- 10Y*
- 10.40%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.73%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $250.04K | $303.92K | $446.15K | |
| $872.37K | $1.31M | $1.44M |
OGIG vs. OUSA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OGIG O’Shares Global Internet Giants ETF | -8.22% | 14.39% | 25.97% | 50.25% | -50.64% | -9.30% | 107.92% | 36.90% | -24.48% |
OUSA OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF | 7.09% | 10.23% | 17.09% | 13.44% | -9.33% | 23.75% | 6.96% | 25.03% | -0.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between OGIG and OUSA is 0.37, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.50 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2018 | 0.53 |
The correlation between OGIG and OUSA shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (1 year) to 0.55 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
OGIG vs. OUSA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
OGIG
OUSA
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Real Estate
-
Industrials
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
OGIG
OUSA
Communication Services
OGIG
OUSA
Consumer Cyclical
OGIG
OUSA
Healthcare
OGIG
OUSA
Real Estate
OGIG
OUSA
-
Industrials
OGIG
OUSA
Financial Services
OGIG
OUSA
Basic Materials
OGIG
-
OUSA
-
Consumer Defensive
OGIG
-
OUSA
Energy
OGIG
-
OUSA
-
Utilities
OGIG
-
OUSA
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OGIG vs. OUSA — Risk / Return Rank
OGIG
OUSA
OGIG vs. OUSA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for O’Shares Global Internet Giants ETF (OGIG) and OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF (OUSA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| OGIG | OUSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.28 | -0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.27 | 1.95 | -2.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.49 | 6.80 | -7.29 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
OGIG vs. OUSA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OGIG drawdown since its inception was -66.05%, which is greater than OUSA's maximum drawdown of -33.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OGIG and OUSA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OGIG | OUSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.05% | -33.12% | -32.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.23% | -8.36% | -24.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.23% | -13.14% | -20.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -62.79% | -19.54% | -43.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.18% | -0.23% | -23.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.71% | -3.50% | -22.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.26% | 2.39% | +15.87% |
Volatility
OGIG vs. OUSA - Volatility Comparison
O’Shares Global Internet Giants ETF (OGIG) has a higher volatility of 7.26% compared to OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF (OUSA) at 3.65%. This indicates that OGIG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OUSA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OGIG | OUSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.26% | 3.65% | +3.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.17% | 8.12% | +12.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.11% | 10.25% | +13.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.82% | 13.38% | +18.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.96% | 15.19% | +15.77% |
OGIG vs. OUSA - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both OGIG and OUSA have an expense ratio of 0.48%.
Dividends
OGIG vs. OUSA - Dividend Comparison
OGIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.08%, less than OUSA's 1.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OGIG O’Shares Global Internet Giants ETF | 0.08% | 0.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
OUSA OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF | 1.35% | 1.39% | 1.50% | 1.81% | 1.92% | 1.56% | 2.03% | 2.31% | 3.06% | 2.15% | 2.32% | 1.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OGIG and OUSA have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OGIG has higher volatility (7.26%) compared to OUSA (3.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OGIG dropped -66.05% vs OUSA's -33.12%.
On 5-year performance, OUSA leads with 8.96% vs -2.57% for OGIG. Both ETFs have the same 0.48% expense ratio. On volatility, OUSA has been the lower-risk option at 3.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, OUSA has performed better with a 8.96% return vs -2.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
OGIG and OUSA have the same expense ratio: 0.48% per year.
OUSA has the higher dividend yield at 1.35%, compared with 0.08% for OGIG.
OGIG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while OUSA is Quality Factor. OGIG tracks O’Shares Global Internet Giants Index, while OUSA tracks O'Shares US Quality Dividend Index.
OUSA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs -0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OGIG and OUSA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer