OGIG vs. MFUS
OGIG (O’Shares Global Internet Giants ETF) and MFUS (PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - OGIG tracks the O’Shares Global Internet Giants Index while MFUS tracks the RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, OGIG returned -2.07%/yr vs 12.82%/yr for MFUS. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. OGIG charges 0.48%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for MFUS.
Performance
OGIG vs. MFUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OGIG achieves a -9.21% return, which is significantly lower than MFUS's 16.37% return.
OGIG
- 1D
- -3.46%
- 1M
- 6.90%
- YTD
- -9.21%
- 6M
- -10.93%
- 1Y
- -6.52%
- 3Y*
- 15.13%
- 5Y*
- -2.07%
- 10Y*
- —
MFUS
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 5.72%
- YTD
- 16.37%
- 6M
- 16.58%
- 1Y
- 28.04%
- 3Y*
- 22.25%
- 5Y*
- 12.82%
- 10Y*
- —
OGIG vs. MFUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OGIG O’Shares Global Internet Giants ETF | -9.21% | 14.39% | 25.97% | 50.25% | -50.64% | -9.30% | 107.92% | 36.90% | -24.48% |
MFUS PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF | 16.37% | 16.02% | 20.17% | 12.19% | -5.82% | 24.10% | 10.64% | 26.17% | -11.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between OGIG and MFUS is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2018 | 0.58 |
The correlation between OGIG and MFUS shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (1 year) to 0.58 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
OGIG vs. MFUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
OGIG
MFUS
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Healthcare
Real Estate
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Technology
OGIG
MFUS
Communication Services
OGIG
MFUS
Consumer Cyclical
OGIG
MFUS
Industrials
OGIG
MFUS
Healthcare
OGIG
MFUS
Real Estate
OGIG
MFUS
Financial Services
OGIG
MFUS
Basic Materials
OGIG
-
MFUS
Consumer Defensive
OGIG
-
MFUS
Energy
OGIG
-
MFUS
Utilities
OGIG
-
MFUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OGIG vs. MFUS — Risk / Return Rank
OGIG
MFUS
OGIG vs. MFUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for O’Shares Global Internet Giants ETF (OGIG) and PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| OGIG | MFUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.93 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.47 | -0.50 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.20 | 4.41 | -4.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.41 | 18.13 | -18.54 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OGIG | MFUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.30 | 2.63 | -2.93 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.07 | 0.86 | -0.92 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | 0.79 | -0.52 |
Drawdowns
OGIG vs. MFUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OGIG drawdown since its inception was -66.05%, which is greater than MFUS's maximum drawdown of -35.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OGIG and MFUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OGIG | MFUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.05% | -35.21% | -30.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.23% | -6.39% | -26.84% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.23% | -15.39% | -17.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -62.79% | -18.22% | -44.57% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.99% | 0.00% | -24.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.67% | -4.00% | -21.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.84% | 1.55% | +14.29% |
Volatility
OGIG vs. MFUS - Volatility Comparison
O’Shares Global Internet Giants ETF (OGIG) has a higher volatility of 8.15% compared to PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS) at 3.19%. This indicates that OGIG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MFUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OGIG | MFUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.15% | 3.19% | +4.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.28% | 8.22% | +10.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.16% | 10.72% | +11.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.58% | 15.03% | +16.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.03% | 17.35% | +13.68% |
OGIG vs. MFUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
OGIG has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than MFUS's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
OGIG vs. MFUS - Dividend Comparison
OGIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.08%, less than MFUS's 1.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MFUS PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF | 1.36% | 1.54% | 1.45% | 1.96% | 2.07% | 1.35% | 1.72% | 1.89% | 1.69% | 1.01% |
OGIG O’Shares Global Internet Giants ETF | 0.08% | 0.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OGIG and MFUS have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OGIG has higher volatility (8.15%) compared to MFUS (3.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OGIG dropped -66.05% vs MFUS's -35.21%.
On 5-year performance, MFUS leads with 12.82% vs -2.07% for OGIG. On fees, MFUS is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, MFUS has been the lower-risk option at 3.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, MFUS has performed better with a 12.82% return vs -2.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MFUS is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for OGIG.
MFUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.36%, compared with 0.08% for OGIG.
OGIG tracks O’Shares Global Internet Giants Index, while MFUS tracks RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Index. They also come from different issuers: O'Shares Investments and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for OGIG and 0.30% for MFUS.
MFUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs -0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OGIG and MFUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer