OGIG vs. MFUS
OGIG (O’Shares Global Internet Giants ETF) and MFUS (PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - OGIG tracks the O’Shares Global Internet Giants Index while MFUS tracks the RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, OGIG returned -2.57%/yr vs 13.05%/yr for MFUS. Their 0.57 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. OGIG charges 0.48%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for MFUS.
Performance
OGIG vs. MFUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OGIG achieves a -8.22% return, which is significantly lower than MFUS's 16.56% return.
OGIG
- 1D
- 3.19%
- 1M
- 4.98%
- 6M
- 1.25%
- YTD
- -8.22%
- 1Y
- -8.96%
- 3Y*
- 13.89%
- 5Y*
- -2.57%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 8.27%
MFUS
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- -0.34%
- 6M
- 10.78%
- YTD
- 16.56%
- 1Y
- 25.93%
- 3Y*
- 19.97%
- 5Y*
- 13.05%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 13.41%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.69M | $1.08M | $961.02K | |
| $250.04K | $303.92K | $446.15K |
OGIG vs. MFUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OGIG O’Shares Global Internet Giants ETF | -8.22% | 14.39% | 25.97% | 50.25% | -50.64% | -9.30% | 107.92% | 36.90% | -24.48% |
MFUS PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF | 16.56% | 16.02% | 20.17% | 12.19% | -5.82% | 24.10% | 10.64% | 26.17% | -10.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between OGIG and MFUS is 0.33, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.55 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2018 | 0.57 |
Over the past year, the correlation between OGIG and MFUS has dropped to 0.33 - well below their long-term average of 0.57, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
OGIG vs. MFUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
OGIG
MFUS
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Real Estate
Industrials
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Technology
OGIG
MFUS
Communication Services
OGIG
MFUS
Consumer Cyclical
OGIG
MFUS
Healthcare
OGIG
MFUS
Real Estate
OGIG
MFUS
Industrials
OGIG
MFUS
Financial Services
OGIG
MFUS
Basic Materials
OGIG
-
MFUS
Consumer Defensive
OGIG
-
MFUS
Energy
OGIG
-
MFUS
Utilities
OGIG
-
MFUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OGIG vs. MFUS — Risk / Return Rank
OGIG
MFUS
OGIG vs. MFUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for O’Shares Global Internet Giants ETF (OGIG) and PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| OGIG | MFUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.41 | -0.46 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.27 | 4.08 | -4.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.49 | 15.40 | -15.89 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
OGIG vs. MFUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OGIG drawdown since its inception was -66.05%, which is greater than MFUS's maximum drawdown of -35.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OGIG and MFUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OGIG | MFUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.05% | -35.21% | -30.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.23% | -6.39% | -26.84% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.23% | -15.39% | -17.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -62.79% | -18.22% | -44.57% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.18% | -2.18% | -22.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.71% | -3.95% | -21.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.26% | 1.69% | +16.57% |
Volatility
OGIG vs. MFUS - Volatility Comparison
O’Shares Global Internet Giants ETF (OGIG) has a higher volatility of 7.26% compared to PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS) at 2.92%. This indicates that OGIG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MFUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OGIG | MFUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.26% | 2.92% | +4.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.17% | 9.12% | +11.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.11% | 11.41% | +12.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.82% | 15.02% | +16.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.96% | 17.28% | +13.68% |
OGIG vs. MFUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
OGIG has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than MFUS's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
OGIG vs. MFUS - Dividend Comparison
OGIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.08%, less than MFUS's 1.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MFUS PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF | 1.37% | 1.54% | 1.45% | 1.96% | 2.07% | 1.35% | 1.72% | 1.89% | 1.69% | 1.01% |
OGIG O’Shares Global Internet Giants ETF | 0.08% | 0.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OGIG and MFUS have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OGIG has higher volatility (7.26%) compared to MFUS (2.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OGIG dropped -66.05% vs MFUS's -35.21%.
On 5-year performance, MFUS leads with 13.05% vs -2.57% for OGIG. On fees, MFUS is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, MFUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, MFUS has performed better with a 13.05% return vs -2.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MFUS is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for OGIG.
MFUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.37%, compared with 0.08% for OGIG.
OGIG tracks O’Shares Global Internet Giants Index, while MFUS tracks RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Index. They also come from different issuers: O'Shares Investments and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for OGIG and 0.30% for MFUS.
MFUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs -0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OGIG and MFUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer