OGC.TO vs. CDE
OGC.TO (OceanaGold Corporation) and CDE (Coeur Mining, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Gold industry within the Basic Materials sector. Over the past 10 years, OGC.TO returned 8.68%/yr vs 3.40%/yr for CDE. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
OGC.TO vs. CDE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
OGC.TO is traded in CAD, while CDE is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CDE values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OGC.TO achieves a -9.52% return, which is significantly lower than CDE's -7.28% return. Over the past 10 years, OGC.TO has outperformed CDE with an annualized return of 8.68%, while CDE has yielded a comparatively lower 3.40% annualized return.
OGC.TO
- 1D
- -0.65%
- 1M
- -0.51%
- 6M
- -16.65%
- YTD
- -9.52%
- 1Y
- 80.78%
- 3Y*
- 65.79%
- 5Y*
- 38.13%
- 10Y*
- 8.68%
CDE
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- 5.17%
- 6M
- -19.95%
- YTD
- -7.28%
- 1Y
- 81.61%
- 3Y*
- 83.07%
- 5Y*
- 16.20%
- 10Y*
- 3.40%
OGC.TO vs. CDE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OGC.TO OceanaGold Corporation | -9.52% | 227.48% | 57.16% | -1.22% | 17.27% | -10.57% | -3.53% | -48.74% | 54.71% | -17.19% |
CDE Coeur Mining, Inc. | -7.21% | 197.48% | 90.32% | -5.28% | -29.11% | -51.33% | 25.05% | 73.31% | -35.39% | -23.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between OGC.TO and CDE is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2007 | 0.49 |
Over the past year, OGC.TO and CDE have become more correlated (0.71) than their long-term average of 0.49, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
OGC.TO:
CA$7.83B
CDE:
$10.41B
OGC.TO:
$1.94
CDE:
$1.84
OGC.TO:
12.74
CDE:
8.67
OGC.TO:
0.03
CDE:
0.08
OGC.TO:
4.30
CDE:
2.70
OGC.TO:
$2.25B
CDE:
$2.57B
OGC.TO:
$1.24B
CDE:
$909.07M
OGC.TO:
$1.22B
CDE:
$1.23B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OGC.TO vs. CDE — Risk / Return Rank
OGC.TO
CDE
OGC.TO vs. CDE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for OceanaGold Corporation (OGC.TO) and Coeur Mining, Inc. (CDE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| OGC.TO | CDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.22 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.98 | 1.95 | +0.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.65 | 3.44 | +1.21 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
OGC.TO vs. CDE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OGC.TO drawdown since its inception was -96.53%, roughly equal to the maximum CDE drawdown of -97.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OGC.TO and CDE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OGC.TO | CDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.53% | -97.51% | +0.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -42.13% | -42.02% | -0.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.13% | -42.02% | -0.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.87% | -73.01% | +26.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -76.17% | -86.77% | +10.60% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -39.54% | -77.47% | +37.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.05% | -78.96% | +38.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.88% | 23.82% | -5.94% |
Volatility
OGC.TO vs. CDE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for OceanaGold Corporation (OGC.TO) is 15.11%, while Coeur Mining, Inc. (CDE) has a volatility of 20.29%. This indicates that OGC.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CDE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OGC.TO | CDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.11% | 20.29% | -5.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 42.03% | 56.06% | -14.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.98% | 72.42% | -20.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.00% | 68.98% | -18.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 52.57% | 69.25% | -16.68% |
Dividends
OGC.TO vs. CDE - Dividend Comparison
OGC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%, more than CDE's 0.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDE Coeur Mining, Inc. | 0.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
OGC.TO OceanaGold Corporation | 0.94% | 0.29% | 0.23% | 0.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.18% | 0.26% | 0.27% | 0.46% | 0.63% |
Financials
OGC.TO vs. CDE - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between OceanaGold Corporation and Coeur Mining, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
OGC.TO vs. CDE - Profitability Comparison
OGC.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, OceanaGold Corporation reported a gross profit of 397.08M and revenue of 702.79M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 56.5%.
CDE - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Coeur Mining, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 856.19M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
OGC.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, OceanaGold Corporation reported an operating income of 330.79M and revenue of 702.79M, resulting in an operating margin of 47.1%.
CDE - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Coeur Mining, Inc. reported an operating income of 349.17M and revenue of 856.19M, resulting in an operating margin of 40.8%.
OGC.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, OceanaGold Corporation reported a net income of 224.66M and revenue of 702.79M, resulting in a net margin of 32.0%.
CDE - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Coeur Mining, Inc. reported a net income of 246.76M and revenue of 856.19M, resulting in a net margin of 28.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
OGC.TO and CDE have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for OGC.TO and CDE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer