PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CDE vs. AG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CDE vs. AG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Coeur Mining, Inc. (CDE) and First Majestic Silver Corp. (AG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CDE achieves a 7.75% return, which is significantly lower than AG's 26.14% return. Over the past 10 years, CDE has outperformed AG with an annualized return of 8.66%, while AG has yielded a comparatively lower 6.12% annualized return.


CDE

1D
-0.67%
1M
8.85%
YTD
7.75%
6M
16.08%
1Y
122.61%
3Y*
83.68%
5Y*
14.48%
10Y*
8.66%

AG

1D
0.77%
1M
5.84%
YTD
26.14%
6M
32.08%
1Y
205.74%
3Y*
52.85%
5Y*
3.97%
10Y*
6.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CDE vs. AG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CDE
Coeur Mining, Inc.
7.75%211.71%75.46%-2.98%-33.33%-51.30%28.09%80.76%-40.40%-17.49%
AG
First Majestic Silver Corp.
26.14%204.32%-10.47%-25.99%-24.73%-17.24%9.62%108.15%-12.61%-11.66%

Correlation

The correlation between CDE and AG is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2010

0.76

The correlation between CDE and AG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

EPS

CDE:

$1.64

AG:

$0.60

PE Ratio

CDE:

11.67

AG:

35.20

PEG Ratio

CDE:

0.10

AG:

0.63

PS Ratio

CDE:

3.64

AG:

6.94

Total Revenue (TTM)

CDE:

$2.57B

AG:

$1.49B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CDE:

$909.07M

AG:

$646.49M

EBITDA (TTM)

CDE:

$1.23B

AG:

$824.25M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CDE vs. AG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CDE
CDE Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
CDE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CDE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
CDE Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
CDE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
CDE Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

AG
AG Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
AG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
AG Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
AG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
AG Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CDE vs. AG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Coeur Mining, Inc. (CDE) and First Majestic Silver Corp. (AG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CDEAGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.78

2.84

-1.06

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.25

3.02

-0.76

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.38

-0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.41

5.61

-2.21

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.67

12.63

-5.96

CDE vs. AG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CDE Sharpe Ratio is 1.78, which is lower than the AG Sharpe Ratio of 2.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CDE and AG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CDEAGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.78

2.84

-1.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

0.07

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.13

0.10

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.10

0.05

-0.15

Drawdowns

CDE vs. AG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CDE drawdown since its inception was -99.40%, which is greater than AG's maximum drawdown of -90.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CDE and AG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CDEAGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.40%

-90.20%

-9.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-40.44%

-42.92%

+2.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-40.44%

-42.92%

+2.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-81.79%

-76.89%

-4.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-87.42%

-80.82%

-6.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-93.34%

-34.37%

-58.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-81.49%

-59.21%

-22.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

20.65%

19.08%

+1.57%

Volatility

CDE vs. AG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Coeur Mining, Inc. (CDE) is 19.40%, while First Majestic Silver Corp. (AG) has a volatility of 21.88%. This indicates that CDE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CDEAGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.40%

21.88%

-2.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

53.13%

55.72%

-2.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

69.59%

73.78%

-4.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

68.16%

61.33%

+6.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

68.72%

61.82%

+6.90%

Dividends

CDE vs. AG - Dividend Comparison

CDE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.10%, less than AG's 0.17% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
AG
First Majestic Silver Corp.
0.17%0.12%0.33%0.34%0.31%0.14%
CDE
Coeur Mining, Inc.
0.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

CDE vs. AG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Coeur Mining, Inc. and First Majestic Silver Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M20222023202420252026
856.19M
470.07M
(CDE) Total Revenue
(AG) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CDE vs. AG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Coeur Mining, Inc. and First Majestic Silver Corp. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%202220232024202520260
55.3%
Portfolio components
CDE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Coeur Mining, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 856.19M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

AG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, First Majestic Silver Corp. reported a gross profit of 259.78M and revenue of 470.07M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.3%.

CDE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Coeur Mining, Inc. reported an operating income of 349.17M and revenue of 856.19M, resulting in an operating margin of 40.8%.

AG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, First Majestic Silver Corp. reported an operating income of 232.71M and revenue of 470.07M, resulting in an operating margin of 49.5%.

CDE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Coeur Mining, Inc. reported a net income of 246.76M and revenue of 856.19M, resulting in a net margin of 28.8%.

AG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, First Majestic Silver Corp. reported a net income of 126.32M and revenue of 470.07M, resulting in a net margin of 26.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CDE and AG have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AG has higher volatility (21.88%) compared to CDE (19.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CDE dropped -99.40% vs AG's -90.20%.

AG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.84 vs 1.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CDE and AG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer