OGC.TO vs. RY
Compare and contrast key facts about OceanaGold Corporation (OGC.TO) and Royal Bank of Canada (RY).
Performance
OGC.TO vs. RY - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
OGC.TO vs. RY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OGC.TO OceanaGold Corporation | 13.01% | 228.81% | 58.12% | -0.52% | 17.27% | -10.57% | -3.53% | -48.64% | 55.76% | -16.79% |
RY Royal Bank of Canada | -3.14% | 39.58% | 34.43% | 10.24% | -1.45% | 32.90% | 6.59% | 14.27% | -5.49% | 16.99% |
Different Trading Currencies
OGC.TO is traded in CAD, while RY is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the RY values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Fundamentals
OGC.TO:
CA$10.12B
RY:
$166.45B
OGC.TO:
CA$1.14
RY:
$15.98
OGC.TO:
38.31
RY:
10.12
OGC.TO:
0.08
RY:
1.47
OGC.TO:
12.76
RY:
1.55
OGC.TO:
4.47
RY:
1.29
OGC.TO:
CA$1.90B
RY:
$137.63B
OGC.TO:
CA$1.06B
RY:
$63.36B
OGC.TO:
CA$1.01B
RY:
$29.23B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OGC.TO achieves a 13.01% return, which is significantly higher than RY's -3.14% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with OGC.TO having a 15.83% annualized return and RY not far ahead at 16.01%.
OGC.TO
- 1D
- 5.28%
- 1M
- -24.22%
- YTD
- 13.01%
- 6M
- 48.15%
- 1Y
- 206.98%
- 3Y*
- 64.83%
- 5Y*
- 51.02%
- 10Y*
- 15.83%
RY
- 1D
- 2.38%
- 1M
- -1.35%
- YTD
- -3.14%
- 6M
- 11.33%
- 1Y
- 43.27%
- 3Y*
- 25.05%
- 5Y*
- 18.57%
- 10Y*
- 16.01%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OGC.TO vs. RY — Risk / Return Rank
OGC.TO
RY
OGC.TO vs. RY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for OceanaGold Corporation (OGC.TO) and Royal Bank of Canada (RY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| OGC.TO | RY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 4.14 | 2.86 | +1.28 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.76 | 3.86 | -0.10 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.53 | 1.53 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.71 | 5.50 | +1.21 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 24.51 | 19.43 | +5.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OGC.TO | RY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.14 | 2.86 | +1.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.03 | 1.26 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.30 | 0.96 | -0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.00 | 0.87 | -0.87 |
Correlation
The correlation between OGC.TO and RY is 0.06, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
OGC.TO vs. RY - Dividend Comparison
OGC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%, less than RY's 2.78% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OGC.TO OceanaGold Corporation | 0.57% | 0.43% | 0.68% | 1.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.51% | 0.78% | 0.80% | 1.38% | 1.89% |
RY Royal Bank of Canada | 2.78% | 2.54% | 3.39% | 4.29% | 4.07% | 3.24% | 3.88% | 3.88% | 4.27% | 3.22% | 3.95% | 5.41% |
Drawdowns
OGC.TO vs. RY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OGC.TO drawdown since its inception was -95.74%, which is greater than RY's maximum drawdown of -34.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OGC.TO and RY.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| OGC.TO | RY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.74% | -62.90% | -32.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.60% | -10.04% | -21.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.87% | -28.36% | -18.51% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -77.77% | -39.95% | -37.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.49% | -7.80% | -16.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -38.25% | -9.37% | -28.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.66% | 2.62% | +6.04% |
Volatility
OGC.TO vs. RY - Volatility Comparison
OceanaGold Corporation (OGC.TO) has a higher volatility of 16.48% compared to Royal Bank of Canada (RY) at 4.91%. This indicates that OGC.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| OGC.TO | RY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.48% | 4.91% | +11.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 40.53% | 10.03% | +30.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.36% | 15.23% | +35.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.78% | 14.84% | +34.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 52.74% | 16.78% | +35.96% |
Financials
OGC.TO vs. RY - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between OceanaGold Corporation and Royal Bank of Canada. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
OGC.TO vs. RY - Profitability Comparison
OGC.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, OceanaGold Corporation reported a gross profit of 349.19M and revenue of 662.43M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.7%.
RY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Royal Bank of Canada reported a gross profit of 16.86B and revenue of 35.50B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 47.5%.
OGC.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, OceanaGold Corporation reported an operating income of 298.82M and revenue of 662.43M, resulting in an operating margin of 45.1%.
RY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Royal Bank of Canada reported an operating income of 7.42B and revenue of 35.50B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.9%.
OGC.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, OceanaGold Corporation reported a net income of 332.74M and revenue of 662.43M, resulting in a net margin of 50.2%.
RY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Royal Bank of Canada reported a net income of 5.79B and revenue of 35.50B, resulting in a net margin of 16.3%.