OGC.TO vs. KILO.TO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about OceanaGold Corporation (OGC.TO) and Purpose Gold Bullion Fund (KILO.TO).

Performance

OGC.TO vs. KILO.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in OceanaGold Corporation (OGC.TO) and Purpose Gold Bullion Fund (KILO.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

OGC.TO vs. KILO.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
OGC.TO OceanaGold Corporation	13.01%	228.81%	58.12%	-0.52%	17.27%	-10.57%	-3.53%	-48.64%	31.40%
KILO.TO Purpose Gold Bullion Fund	8.08%	60.17%	25.97%	12.15%	-0.90%	-4.72%	22.91%	18.86%	2.75%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OGC.TO achieves a 13.01% return, which is significantly higher than KILO.TO's 8.08% return.

OGC.TO

• 1D: 5.28%
• 1M: -24.22%
• YTD: 13.01%
• 6M: 48.15%
• 1Y: 206.98%
• 3Y*: 64.83%
• 5Y*: 51.02%
• 10Y*: 15.83%

KILO.TO

• 1D: 3.92%
• 1M: -11.13%
• YTD: 8.08%
• 6M: 19.90%
• 1Y: 45.80%
• 3Y*: 31.34%
• 5Y*: 20.61%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

OGC.TO vs. KILO.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OGC.TO

OGC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 97
OGC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
OGC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
OGC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 96
OGC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
OGC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 98

KILO.TO

KILO.TO Risk / Return Rank: 84
KILO.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
KILO.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
KILO.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 82
KILO.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
KILO.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OGC.TO vs. KILO.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for OceanaGold Corporation (OGC.TO) and Purpose Gold Bullion Fund (KILO.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	OGC.TO	KILO.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	4.14	1.67	+2.47
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.76	2.13	+1.63
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.53	1.31	+0.23
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.71	2.45	+4.27
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	24.51	9.04	+15.46
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

OGC.TO vs. KILO.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OGC.TO Sharpe Ratio is 4.14, which is higher than the KILO.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OGC.TO and KILO.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	OGC.TO	KILO.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.14	1.67	+2.47
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.03	1.17	-0.14
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.30	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.00	1.10	-1.10

Correlation

The correlation between OGC.TO and KILO.TO is 0.53, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

OGC.TO vs. KILO.TO - Dividend Comparison

OGC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%, while KILO.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
OGC.TO OceanaGold Corporation	0.57%	0.43%	0.68%	1.10%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.51%	0.78%	0.80%	1.38%	1.89%
KILO.TO Purpose Gold Bullion Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	1.41%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

OGC.TO vs. KILO.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OGC.TO drawdown since its inception was -95.74%, which is greater than KILO.TO's maximum drawdown of -22.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OGC.TO and KILO.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	OGC.TO	KILO.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-95.74%	-22.67%	-73.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-31.60%	-19.62%	-11.98%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-46.87%	-21.31%	-25.56%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-77.77%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-24.49%	-13.50%	-10.99%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-38.25%	-7.02%	-31.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.66%	5.31%	+3.35%

Volatility

OGC.TO vs. KILO.TO - Volatility Comparison

OceanaGold Corporation (OGC.TO) has a higher volatility of 16.48% compared to Purpose Gold Bullion Fund (KILO.TO) at 11.21%. This indicates that OGC.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KILO.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	OGC.TO	KILO.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.48%	11.21%	+5.27%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	40.53%	23.93%	+16.60%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	50.36%	27.59%	+22.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	49.78%	17.66%	+32.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	52.74%	18.04%	+34.70%