CDE vs. IAG

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Coeur Mining, Inc. (CDE) and IAMGOLD Corporation (IAG).

Performance

CDE vs. IAG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Coeur Mining, Inc. (CDE) and IAMGOLD Corporation (IAG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CDE vs. IAG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CDE Coeur Mining, Inc.	7.18%	211.71%	75.46%	-2.98%	-33.33%	-51.30%	28.09%	80.76%	-40.40%	-17.49%
IAG IAMGOLD Corporation	19.35%	219.57%	103.95%	-1.94%	-17.57%	-14.71%	-1.61%	1.36%	-36.88%	51.43%

Fundamentals

EPS CDE : $0.63 IAG : $1.15
PE Ratio CDE : 30.25 IAG : 17.05
PEG Ratio CDE : 0.26 IAG : 0.10
PS Ratio CDE : 7.27 IAG : 3.98
Total Revenue (TTM) CDE : $1.70B IAG : $2.87B
Gross Profit (TTM) CDE : $835.24M IAG : $1.21B
EBITDA (TTM) CDE : $695.36M IAG : $1.51B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CDE achieves a 7.18% return, which is significantly lower than IAG's 19.35% return. Over the past 10 years, CDE has underperformed IAG with an annualized return of 12.98%, while IAG has yielded a comparatively higher 24.16% annualized return.

CDE

• 1D: 1.81%
• 1M: -29.06%
• YTD: 7.18%
• 6M: 1.22%
• 1Y: 242.47%
• 3Y*: 68.56%
• 5Y*: 15.30%
• 10Y*: 12.98%

IAG

• 1D: 4.57%
• 1M: -18.85%
• YTD: 19.35%
• 6M: 50.80%
• 1Y: 211.39%
• 3Y*: 93.65%
• 5Y*: 44.35%
• 10Y*: 24.16%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

CDE vs. IAG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CDE

CDE Risk / Return Rank: 94
CDE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
CDE Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
CDE Omega Ratio Rank: 92
CDE Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
CDE Martin Ratio Rank: 93

IAG

IAG Risk / Return Rank: 95
IAG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
IAG Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
IAG Omega Ratio Rank: 92
IAG Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
IAG Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CDE vs. IAG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Coeur Mining, Inc. (CDE) and IAMGOLD Corporation (IAG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CDE	IAG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.29	3.39	-0.10
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.29	3.20	+0.08
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.44	0.00
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.51	6.21	-0.70
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	13.42	18.70	-5.28
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CDE vs. IAG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CDE Sharpe Ratio is 3.29, which is comparable to the IAG Sharpe Ratio of 3.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CDE and IAG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CDE	IAG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.29	3.39	-0.10
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.23	0.74	-0.52
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.19	0.41	-0.22
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.10	0.12	-0.22

Correlation

The correlation between CDE and IAG is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

CDE vs. IAG - Dividend Comparison

Neither CDE nor IAG has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

CDE vs. IAG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CDE drawdown since its inception was -99.40%, roughly equal to the maximum IAG drawdown of -95.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CDE and IAG.

Drawdown Indicators

	CDE	IAG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.40%	-95.55%	-3.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-40.44%	-34.60%	-5.84%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-81.79%	-74.52%	-7.27%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-87.42%	-86.46%	-0.96%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-93.38%	-19.90%	-73.48%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-81.43%	-56.44%	-24.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	16.60%	11.49%	+5.11%

Volatility

CDE vs. IAG - Volatility Comparison

Coeur Mining, Inc. (CDE) has a higher volatility of 23.93% compared to IAMGOLD Corporation (IAG) at 19.94%. This indicates that CDE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IAG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CDE	IAG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	23.93%	19.94%	+3.99%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	58.45%	48.87%	+9.58%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	74.59%	62.82%	+11.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	68.31%	59.87%	+8.44%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	68.94%	59.14%	+9.80%

Financials

CDE vs. IAG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Coeur Mining, Inc. and IAMGOLD Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

CDE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Coeur Mining, Inc. reported a gross profit of 305.83M and revenue of 554.57M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.2%.

IAG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, IAMGOLD Corporation reported a gross profit of 595.72M and revenue of 1.10B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 53.9%.

CDE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Coeur Mining, Inc. reported an operating income of 177.09M and revenue of 554.57M, resulting in an operating margin of 31.9%.

IAG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, IAMGOLD Corporation reported an operating income of 576.53M and revenue of 1.10B, resulting in an operating margin of 52.2%.

CDE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Coeur Mining, Inc. reported a net income of 266.82M and revenue of 554.57M, resulting in a net margin of 48.1%.

IAG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, IAMGOLD Corporation reported a net income of 412.85M and revenue of 1.10B, resulting in a net margin of 37.4%.