PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OFG vs. LMT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

OFG vs. LMT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in OFG Bancorp (OFG) and Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OFG achieves a 12.19% return, which is significantly higher than LMT's 7.41% return. Over the past 10 years, OFG has outperformed LMT with an annualized return of 20.67%, while LMT has yielded a comparatively lower 10.84% annualized return.


OFG

1D
1.88%
1M
-0.37%
YTD
12.19%
6M
15.66%
1Y
13.72%
3Y*
23.00%
5Y*
16.71%
10Y*
20.67%

LMT

1D
-0.59%
1M
0.78%
YTD
7.41%
6M
17.59%
1Y
10.12%
3Y*
6.98%
5Y*
8.69%
10Y*
10.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OFG vs. LMT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
OFG
OFG Bancorp
12.19%-0.35%15.81%40.22%6.54%45.63%-19.79%45.34%78.29%-26.43%
LMT
Lockheed Martin Corporation
7.41%2.47%10.02%-4.31%40.48%3.15%-6.49%52.55%-16.35%31.77%

Correlation

The correlation between OFG and LMT is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 29, 1990

0.17

The correlation between OFG and LMT shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (3 years) to 0.21 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

OFG:

$4.49

LMT:

$20.61

PE Ratio

OFG:

10.15

LMT:

24.91

PS Ratio

OFG:

2.41

LMT:

1.59

Total Revenue (TTM)

OFG:

$862.62M

LMT:

$75.12B

Gross Profit (TTM)

OFG:

$614.52M

LMT:

$7.37B

EBITDA (TTM)

OFG:

$285.15M

LMT:

$8.09B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OFG vs. LMT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OFG
OFG Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
OFG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OFG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
OFG Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
OFG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
OFG Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

LMT
LMT Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
LMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
LMT Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
LMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
LMT Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OFG vs. LMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for OFG Bancorp (OFG) and Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


OFGLMTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.54

0.38

+0.16

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.88

0.67

+0.21

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.09

+0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.83

0.40

+0.43

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.90

1.00

+0.91

OFG vs. LMT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OFG Sharpe Ratio is 0.54, which is higher than the LMT Sharpe Ratio of 0.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OFG and LMT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


OFGLMTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

0.38

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

0.38

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

0.46

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.27

0.38

-0.11

Drawdowns

OFG vs. LMT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OFG drawdown since its inception was -96.64%, which is greater than LMT's maximum drawdown of -79.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OFG and LMT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OFGLMTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.64%

-79.29%

-17.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.13%

-25.15%

+8.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.56%

-31.79%

+7.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.56%

-31.79%

+7.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.25%

-36.67%

-24.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.15%

-23.63%

+22.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.49%

-26.84%

-2.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.44%

10.11%

-2.67%

Volatility

OFG vs. LMT - Volatility Comparison

OFG Bancorp (OFG) has a higher volatility of 5.92% compared to Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) at 5.55%. This indicates that OFG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OFGLMTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.92%

5.55%

+0.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.52%

19.87%

-1.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.44%

26.54%

-1.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.87%

22.89%

+6.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

39.10%

23.71%

+15.39%

Dividends

OFG vs. LMT - Dividend Comparison

OFG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.74%, more than LMT's 2.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LMT
Lockheed Martin Corporation
2.66%2.76%2.62%2.68%2.34%2.98%2.76%2.31%3.13%2.32%2.71%2.83%
OFG
OFG Bancorp
2.74%2.93%2.36%2.35%2.54%1.51%1.51%1.19%1.52%2.55%1.83%4.92%

Financials

OFG vs. LMT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between OFG Bancorp and Lockheed Martin Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B20222023202420252026
228.80M
18.02B
(OFG) Total Revenue
(LMT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

OFG vs. LMT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between OFG Bancorp and Lockheed Martin Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
80.6%
11.5%
Portfolio components
OFG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, OFG Bancorp reported a gross profit of 184.32M and revenue of 228.80M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 80.6%.

LMT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lockheed Martin Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.08B and revenue of 18.02B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 11.5%.

OFG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, OFG Bancorp reported an operating income of 79.31M and revenue of 228.80M, resulting in an operating margin of 34.7%.

LMT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lockheed Martin Corporation reported an operating income of 2.06B and revenue of 18.02B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.5%.

OFG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, OFG Bancorp reported a net income of 55.89M and revenue of 228.80M, resulting in a net margin of 24.4%.

LMT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lockheed Martin Corporation reported a net income of 1.49B and revenue of 18.02B, resulting in a net margin of 8.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


OFG and LMT have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OFG has higher volatility (5.92%) compared to LMT (5.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OFG dropped -96.64% vs LMT's -79.29%.

OFG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.54 vs 0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OFG and LMT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer