OEFA vs. BCI
OEFA (ALPS O'Shares International Developed Quality Dividend ETF) and BCI (abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - OEFA is a International Equity fund tracking the O’Shares International Developed Quality Dividend Index, while BCI is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.09, they often move in opposite directions. OEFA charges 0.48%/yr vs 0.26%/yr for BCI.
Performance
OEFA vs. BCI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OEFA achieves a 3.09% return, which is significantly lower than BCI's 16.69% return.
OEFA
- 1D
- -0.66%
- 1M
- 1.57%
- YTD
- 3.09%
- 6M
- 3.35%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BCI
- 1D
- -0.65%
- 1M
- -8.66%
- YTD
- 16.69%
- 6M
- 16.52%
- 1Y
- 22.05%
- 3Y*
- 11.86%
- 5Y*
- 9.82%
- 10Y*
- —
OEFA vs. BCI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
OEFA ALPS O'Shares International Developed Quality Dividend ETF | 3.09% | 0.73% |
BCI abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF | 16.69% | 5.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between OEFA and BCI is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2025 | -0.09 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OEFA vs. BCI — Risk / Return Rank
OEFA
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BCI
OEFA vs. BCI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS O'Shares International Developed Quality Dividend ETF (OEFA) and abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| OEFA | BCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.24 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.84 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 6.82 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
OEFA vs. BCI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OEFA drawdown since its inception was -13.54%, smaller than the maximum BCI drawdown of -32.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OEFA and BCI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OEFA | BCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.54% | -32.69% | +19.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -12.04% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -12.04% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.50% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.16% | -12.04% | +8.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.71% | -11.98% | +8.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.56% | — |
Volatility
OEFA vs. BCI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OEFA | BCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.49% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 14.94% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.73% | 17.18% | +0.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.73% | 16.79% | +0.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.73% | 15.65% | +2.08% |
OEFA vs. BCI - Expense Ratio Comparison
OEFA has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than BCI's 0.26% expense ratio.
Dividends
OEFA vs. BCI - Dividend Comparison
OEFA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.44%, less than BCI's 14.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCI abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF | 14.13% | 16.49% | 3.29% | 3.93% | 19.98% | 19.43% | 0.68% | 1.47% | 1.13% | 5.02% |
OEFA ALPS O'Shares International Developed Quality Dividend ETF | 1.44% | 0.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OEFA and BCI have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BCI is cheaper at 0.26% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BCI is cheaper with a 0.26% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for OEFA.
BCI has the higher dividend yield at 14.13%, compared with 1.44% for OEFA.
OEFA is categorized as International Equity, while BCI is Commodities. OEFA tracks O’Shares International Developed Quality Dividend Index, while BCI tracks Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return. They also come from different issuers: ALPS and Aberdeen. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for OEFA and 0.26% for BCI.
Find the right allocation for OEFA and BCI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer