OEFA vs. CCNR

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

OEFA (ALPS O'Shares International Developed Quality Dividend ETF) and CCNR (ALPS/CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - OEFA is a International Equity fund tracking the O’Shares International Developed Quality Dividend Index, while CCNR is a Natural Resources fund actively managed by ALPS. OEFA is passively managed, while CCNR is actively managed. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. OEFA charges 0.48%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for CCNR.

Performance

OEFA vs. CCNR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ALPS O'Shares International Developed Quality Dividend ETF (OEFA) and ALPS/CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF (CCNR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OEFA achieves a 2.38% return, which is significantly lower than CCNR's 15.27% return.

OEFA

• 1D: -0.69%
• 1M: 0.87%
• YTD: 2.38%
• 6M: 1.89%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CCNR

• 1D: -1.98%
• 1M: -8.35%
• YTD: 15.27%
• 6M: 15.14%
• 1Y: 50.76%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OEFA vs. CCNR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
OEFA ALPS O'Shares International Developed Quality Dividend ETF	2.38%	0.73%
CCNR ALPS/CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF	15.27%	10.75%

Correlation

The correlation between OEFA and CCNR is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2025	0.49

OEFA vs. CCNR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	OEFA	CCNR
Industrials	27.4%	7.1%
Consumer Cyclical	15.2%	0.3%
Healthcare	14.5%	-
Technology	14.0%	6.0%
Financial Services	10.9%	0.6%
Consumer Defensive	9.1%	8.3%
Communication Services	5.8%	-
Utilities	3.1%	9.4%
Basic Materials	-	34.5%
Energy	-	34.5%
Real Estate	-	0.5%

Return for Risk

OEFA vs. CCNR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OEFA

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CCNR

CCNR Risk / Return Rank: 86
CCNR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
CCNR Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
CCNR Omega Ratio Rank: 82
CCNR Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
CCNR Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OEFA vs. CCNR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS O'Shares International Developed Quality Dividend ETF (OEFA) and ALPS/CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF (CCNR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	OEFA	CCNR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.71	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	3.35	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.46	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	4.91	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	20.65	—

Drawdowns

OEFA vs. CCNR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OEFA drawdown since its inception was -13.54%, smaller than the maximum CCNR drawdown of -20.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OEFA and CCNR.

Drawdown Indicators

	OEFA	CCNR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.54%	-20.06%	+6.52%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-10.38%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.83%	-10.38%	+6.55%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.71%	-3.63%	-0.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.46%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	OEFA	CCNR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	7.02%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	14.14%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.70%	18.83%	-1.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.70%	20.16%	-2.46%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.70%	20.16%	-2.46%

OEFA vs. CCNR - Expense Ratio Comparison

OEFA has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than CCNR's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

OEFA vs. CCNR - Dividend Comparison

OEFA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, less than CCNR's 3.02% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
CCNR ALPS/CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF	3.02%	3.48%	1.27%
OEFA ALPS O'Shares International Developed Quality Dividend ETF	1.45%	0.28%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both OEFA and CCNR in my portfolio?

OEFA and CCNR have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, OEFA or CCNR?

On fees, CCNR is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, OEFA or CCNR?

CCNR is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for OEFA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, OEFA or CCNR?

CCNR has the higher dividend yield at 3.02%, compared with 1.45% for OEFA.

What is the main difference between OEFA and CCNR?

OEFA is categorized as International Equity, while CCNR is Natural Resources. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for OEFA and 0.39% for CCNR.