OEFA vs. SMTH
OEFA (ALPS O'Shares International Developed Quality Dividend ETF) and SMTH (ALPS Smith Core Plus Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - OEFA is a International Equity fund tracking the O’Shares International Developed Quality Dividend Index, while SMTH is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by ALPS. OEFA is passively managed, while SMTH is actively managed. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. OEFA charges 0.48%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for SMTH.
Performance
OEFA vs. SMTH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OEFA achieves a 2.38% return, which is significantly higher than SMTH's 0.58% return.
OEFA
- 1D
- -0.69%
- 1M
- 0.87%
- YTD
- 2.38%
- 6M
- 1.89%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SMTH
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.67%
- YTD
- 0.58%
- 6M
- 0.70%
- 1Y
- 4.96%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OEFA vs. SMTH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
OEFA ALPS O'Shares International Developed Quality Dividend ETF | 2.38% | 0.73% |
SMTH ALPS Smith Core Plus Bond ETF | 0.58% | 0.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between OEFA and SMTH is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2025 | 0.53 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OEFA vs. SMTH — Risk / Return Rank
OEFA
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SMTH
OEFA vs. SMTH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS O'Shares International Developed Quality Dividend ETF (OEFA) and ALPS Smith Core Plus Bond ETF (SMTH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| OEFA | SMTH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.23 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.82 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 5.21 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
OEFA vs. SMTH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OEFA drawdown since its inception was -13.54%, which is greater than SMTH's maximum drawdown of -4.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OEFA and SMTH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OEFA | SMTH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.54% | -4.11% | -9.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.74% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.83% | -1.17% | -2.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.71% | -1.06% | -2.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.95% | — |
Volatility
OEFA vs. SMTH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OEFA | SMTH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.02% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 2.73% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.70% | 3.81% | +13.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.70% | 4.57% | +13.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.70% | 4.57% | +13.13% |
OEFA vs. SMTH - Expense Ratio Comparison
OEFA has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than SMTH's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
OEFA vs. SMTH - Dividend Comparison
OEFA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, less than SMTH's 4.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
OEFA ALPS O'Shares International Developed Quality Dividend ETF | 1.45% | 0.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SMTH ALPS Smith Core Plus Bond ETF | 4.38% | 4.46% | 4.58% | 0.24% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OEFA and SMTH have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, OEFA is cheaper at 0.48% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
OEFA is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for SMTH.
SMTH has the higher dividend yield at 4.38%, compared with 1.45% for OEFA.
OEFA is categorized as International Equity, while SMTH is Intermediate Core-Plus Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for OEFA and 0.59% for SMTH.
Find the right allocation for OEFA and SMTH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer