ODFL vs. ROM
ODFL (Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc.) is a stock, while ROM (ProShares Ultra Technology) is Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S&P Technology Select Sector Index (200%). Over the past 10 years, ODFL returned 25.09%/yr vs 37.35%/yr for ROM. Their 0.50 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
ODFL vs. ROM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ODFL achieves a 35.26% return, which is significantly lower than ROM's 41.82% return. Over the past 10 years, ODFL has underperformed ROM with an annualized return of 25.09%, while ROM has yielded a comparatively higher 37.35% annualized return.
ODFL
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- -2.82%
- 6M
- 13.94%
- YTD
- 35.26%
- 1Y
- 50.09%
- 3Y*
- 1.86%
- 5Y*
- 9.91%
- 10Y*
- 25.09%
- ALL TIME*
- 18.56%
ROM
- 1D
- 3.27%
- 1M
- -4.03%
- 6M
- 40.14%
- YTD
- 41.82%
- 1Y
- 71.95%
- 3Y*
- 45.93%
- 5Y*
- 20.41%
- 10Y*
- 37.35%
- ALL TIME*
- 23.83%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $433.96M | $379.73M | $408.80M | |
| $7.66M | $7.43M | $10.38M |
ODFL vs. ROM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ODFL Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. | 35.26% | -10.47% | -12.51% | 43.46% | -20.48% | 84.15% | 54.81% | 54.36% | -5.79% | 54.11% |
ROM ProShares Ultra Technology | 41.82% | 35.63% | 31.65% | 130.70% | -63.86% | 77.75% | 80.42% | 102.10% | -9.89% | 81.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between ODFL and ROM is 0.17, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.30 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.44 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2007 | 0.50 |
Over the past year, the correlation between ODFL and ROM has dropped to 0.17 - well below their long-term average of 0.50, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ODFL vs. ROM — Risk / Return Rank
ODFL
ROM
ODFL vs. ROM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. (ODFL) and ProShares Ultra Technology (ROM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ODFL | ROM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.24 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.46 | 2.24 | +0.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.54 | 5.61 | -0.07 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ODFL vs. ROM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ODFL drawdown since its inception was -66.29%, smaller than the maximum ROM drawdown of -83.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ODFL and ROM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ODFL | ROM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.29% | -83.36% | +17.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.49% | -32.33% | +11.84% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -45.18% | -48.10% | +2.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.18% | -67.55% | +22.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.18% | -67.55% | +22.37% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.96% | -21.80% | +6.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.05% | -20.84% | +1.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.06% | 12.86% | -3.80% |
Volatility
ODFL vs. ROM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. (ODFL) is 9.77%, while ProShares Ultra Technology (ROM) has a volatility of 18.45%. This indicates that ODFL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ROM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ODFL | ROM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.77% | 18.45% | -8.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.35% | 43.62% | -13.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.30% | 51.23% | -12.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.73% | 53.28% | -16.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.21% | 50.59% | -17.38% |
Dividends
ODFL vs. ROM - Dividend Comparison
ODFL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, more than ROM's 0.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ODFL Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. | 0.54% | 0.71% | 0.59% | 0.39% | 0.42% | 0.22% | 0.31% | 0.36% | 0.42% | 0.38% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ROM ProShares Ultra Technology | 0.07% | 0.24% | 0.21% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.05% | 0.16% | 0.30% | 0.08% | 0.20% | 0.12% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ODFL and ROM have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ROM has higher volatility (18.45%) compared to ODFL (9.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ODFL dropped -66.29% vs ROM's -83.36%.
ROM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.41 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ODFL and ROM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer