PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ODDS vs. PTNQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ODDS vs. PTNQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer BlueStar Digital Entertainment ETF (ODDS) and Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF (PTNQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ODDS achieves a -18.34% return, which is significantly lower than PTNQ's 9.62% return.


ODDS

1D
-1.21%
1M
-2.24%
YTD
-18.34%
6M
-17.81%
1Y
-19.58%
3Y*
7.05%
5Y*
10Y*

PTNQ

1D
-3.23%
1M
-0.25%
YTD
9.62%
6M
8.18%
1Y
26.55%
3Y*
13.52%
5Y*
10.45%
10Y*
16.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ODDS vs. PTNQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
ODDS
Pacer BlueStar Digital Entertainment ETF
-18.34%16.71%27.61%25.03%-15.18%
PTNQ
Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF
9.62%7.18%15.47%34.65%-5.08%

Correlation

The correlation between ODDS and PTNQ is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2022

0.63

The correlation between ODDS and PTNQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (1 year) to 0.62 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ODDS vs. PTNQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ODDS
ODDS Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
ODDS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ODDS Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
ODDS Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
ODDS Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
ODDS Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

PTNQ
PTNQ Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
PTNQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PTNQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
PTNQ Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
PTNQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
PTNQ Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ODDS vs. PTNQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer BlueStar Digital Entertainment ETF (ODDS) and Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF (PTNQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ODDSPTNQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.85

1.27

-0.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.56

2.27

-2.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.94

7.49

-8.43

ODDS vs. PTNQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ODDS Sharpe Ratio is -0.95, which is lower than the PTNQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ODDS and PTNQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ODDS vs. PTNQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ODDS drawdown since its inception was -35.09%, which is greater than PTNQ's maximum drawdown of -28.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ODDS and PTNQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ODDSPTNQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.09%

-28.07%

-7.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.09%

-11.76%

-23.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.09%

-14.19%

-20.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-31.89%

-4.12%

-27.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.40%

-5.68%

-3.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

20.90%

3.55%

+17.35%

Volatility

ODDS vs. PTNQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pacer BlueStar Digital Entertainment ETF (ODDS) is 6.79%, while Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF (PTNQ) has a volatility of 8.74%. This indicates that ODDS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PTNQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ODDSPTNQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.79%

8.74%

-1.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.66%

13.70%

+2.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.69%

17.37%

+3.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.86%

13.39%

+11.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.86%

16.51%

+8.35%

ODDS vs. PTNQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

ODDS has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is lower than PTNQ's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

ODDS vs. PTNQ - Dividend Comparison

ODDS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%, less than PTNQ's 0.80% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ODDS
Pacer BlueStar Digital Entertainment ETF
0.75%2.59%0.56%0.66%0.42%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PTNQ
Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF
0.80%0.88%1.96%1.47%0.62%0.00%0.16%0.44%0.45%0.32%0.30%0.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


ODDS and PTNQ have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PTNQ has higher volatility (8.74%) compared to ODDS (6.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ODDS dropped -35.09% vs PTNQ's -28.07%.

On 3-year performance, PTNQ leads with 13.52% vs 7.05% for ODDS. On fees, ODDS is cheaper at 0.63% per year. On volatility, ODDS has been the lower-risk option at 6.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, PTNQ has performed better with a 13.52% return vs 7.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ODDS is cheaper with a 0.63% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for PTNQ.

PTNQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.80%, compared with 0.75% for ODDS.

ODDS is categorized as Technology Equities, while PTNQ is Large Cap Blend Equities. ODDS tracks BlueStar Global Online Gambling, Video Gaming and eSports Index, while PTNQ tracks Pacer NASDAQ-100 Trendpilot Index. Their fees differ too: 0.63% for ODDS and 0.65% for PTNQ.

PTNQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs -0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ODDS and PTNQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer