ODDS vs. CRTC

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ODDS (Pacer BlueStar Digital Entertainment ETF) and CRTC (Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - ODDS tracks the BlueStar Global Online Gambling, Video Gaming and eSports Index while CRTC tracks the Solactive Whitney U.S. Critical Technologies Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, ODDS returned -13.71% vs 23.78% for CRTC. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ODDS charges 0.63%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for CRTC.

Performance

ODDS vs. CRTC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer BlueStar Digital Entertainment ETF (ODDS) and Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF (CRTC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ODDS achieves a -16.40% return, which is significantly lower than CRTC's 8.59% return.

ODDS

• 1D: -2.39%
• 1M: -0.02%
• YTD: -16.40%
• 6M: -17.80%
• 1Y: -13.71%
• 3Y*: 7.66%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CRTC

• 1D: -1.08%
• 1M: 4.98%
• YTD: 8.59%
• 6M: 8.79%
• 1Y: 23.78%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ODDS vs. CRTC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
ODDS Pacer BlueStar Digital Entertainment ETF	-16.40%	16.71%	27.61%	5.37%
CRTC Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF	8.59%	18.69%	18.05%	7.18%

Correlation

The correlation between ODDS and CRTC is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.59
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2023	0.65

The correlation between ODDS and CRTC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

ODDS vs. CRTC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ODDS	CRTC
Consumer Cyclical	49.9%	6.3%
Communication Services	44.0%	16.0%
Technology	6.1%	33.5%
Basic Materials	-	2.6%
Consumer Defensive	-	0.0%
Energy	-	7.1%
Financial Services	-	0.2%
Healthcare	-	14.1%
Industrials	-	14.1%
Real Estate	-	0.1%
Utilities	-	6.0%

Return for Risk

ODDS vs. CRTC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ODDS

ODDS Risk / Return Rank: 4
ODDS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
ODDS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
ODDS Omega Ratio Rank: 3
ODDS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
ODDS Martin Ratio Rank: 6

CRTC

CRTC Risk / Return Rank: 55
CRTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
CRTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
CRTC Omega Ratio Rank: 53
CRTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
CRTC Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ODDS vs. CRTC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer BlueStar Digital Entertainment ETF (ODDS) and Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF (CRTC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ODDS	CRTC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.68	1.87	-2.55
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.82	2.56	-3.38
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.90	1.32	-0.43
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.39	2.64	-3.03
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.69	9.88	-10.57
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ODDS vs. CRTC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ODDS Sharpe Ratio is -0.68, which is lower than the CRTC Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ODDS and CRTC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ODDS	CRTC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.68	1.87	-2.55
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.28	1.36	-1.08

Drawdowns

ODDS vs. CRTC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ODDS drawdown since its inception was -35.09%, which is greater than CRTC's maximum drawdown of -19.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ODDS and CRTC.

Drawdown Indicators

	ODDS	CRTC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.09%	-19.07%	-16.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-35.09%	-9.05%	-26.04%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-35.09%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-30.27%	-1.27%	-29.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.16%	-2.13%	-7.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	19.81%	2.41%	+17.40%

Volatility

ODDS vs. CRTC - Volatility Comparison

Pacer BlueStar Digital Entertainment ETF (ODDS) has a higher volatility of 4.69% compared to Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF (CRTC) at 3.20%. This indicates that ODDS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRTC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ODDS	CRTC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.69%	3.20%	+1.49%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.74%	9.64%	+6.10%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.36%	12.76%	+7.60%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.87%	15.73%	+9.14%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.87%	15.73%	+9.14%

ODDS vs. CRTC - Expense Ratio Comparison

ODDS has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than CRTC's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

ODDS vs. CRTC - Dividend Comparison

ODDS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.91%, more than CRTC's 1.00% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
CRTC Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF	1.00%	1.03%	1.13%	0.16%	0.00%
ODDS Pacer BlueStar Digital Entertainment ETF	2.91%	2.59%	0.56%	0.66%	0.42%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ODDS and CRTC in my portfolio?

ODDS and CRTC have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ODDS or CRTC?

ODDS has higher volatility (4.69%) compared to CRTC (3.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ODDS dropped -35.09% vs CRTC's -19.07%.

Which ETF is better, ODDS or CRTC?

On 1-year performance, CRTC leads with 23.78% vs -13.71% for ODDS. On fees, CRTC is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, CRTC has been the lower-risk option at 3.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ODDS or CRTC?

Over the 1-year period, CRTC has performed better with a 23.78% return vs -13.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ODDS or CRTC?

CRTC is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for ODDS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ODDS or CRTC?

ODDS has the higher dividend yield at 2.91%, compared with 1.00% for CRTC.

What is the main difference between ODDS and CRTC?

ODDS tracks BlueStar Global Online Gambling, Video Gaming and eSports Index, while CRTC tracks Solactive Whitney U.S. Critical Technologies Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.63% for ODDS and 0.35% for CRTC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CRTC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs -0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.