ODDS vs. CHAT
ODDS (Pacer BlueStar Digital Entertainment ETF) and CHAT (Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. ODDS is passively managed, while CHAT is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, ODDS returned 7.05%/yr vs 51.32%/yr for CHAT. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ODDS charges 0.63%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for CHAT.
Performance
ODDS vs. CHAT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ODDS achieves a -18.34% return, which is significantly lower than CHAT's 63.45% return.
ODDS
- 1D
- -1.21%
- 1M
- -2.24%
- YTD
- -18.34%
- 6M
- -17.81%
- 1Y
- -19.58%
- 3Y*
- 7.05%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CHAT
- 1D
- -7.40%
- 1M
- 7.27%
- YTD
- 63.45%
- 6M
- 62.78%
- 1Y
- 115.67%
- 3Y*
- 51.32%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ODDS vs. CHAT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ODDS Pacer BlueStar Digital Entertainment ETF | -18.34% | 16.71% | 27.61% | 0.32% |
CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF | 63.45% | 49.85% | 30.98% | 21.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between ODDS and CHAT is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2023 | 0.62 |
The correlation between ODDS and CHAT shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (1 year) to 0.61 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ODDS vs. CHAT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ODDS
CHAT
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Technology
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
ODDS
CHAT
Communication Services
ODDS
CHAT
Technology
ODDS
CHAT
Basic Materials
ODDS
-
CHAT
-
Consumer Defensive
ODDS
-
CHAT
-
Energy
ODDS
-
CHAT
-
Financial Services
ODDS
-
CHAT
Healthcare
ODDS
-
CHAT
-
Industrials
ODDS
-
CHAT
Real Estate
ODDS
-
CHAT
-
Utilities
ODDS
-
CHAT
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ODDS vs. CHAT — Risk / Return Rank
ODDS
CHAT
ODDS vs. CHAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer BlueStar Digital Entertainment ETF (ODDS) and Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ODDS | CHAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.85 | 1.49 | -0.64 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.56 | 7.14 | -7.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.94 | 19.81 | -20.75 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ODDS vs. CHAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ODDS drawdown since its inception was -35.09%, which is greater than CHAT's maximum drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ODDS and CHAT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ODDS | CHAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.09% | -31.34% | -3.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.09% | -16.28% | -18.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.09% | -31.34% | -3.75% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.89% | -7.40% | -24.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.40% | -5.38% | -4.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.90% | 5.86% | +15.04% |
Volatility
ODDS vs. CHAT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Pacer BlueStar Digital Entertainment ETF (ODDS) is 6.79%, while Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) has a volatility of 19.25%. This indicates that ODDS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ODDS | CHAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.79% | 19.25% | -12.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.66% | 29.60% | -12.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.69% | 34.87% | -14.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.86% | 31.22% | -6.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.86% | 31.22% | -6.36% |
ODDS vs. CHAT - Expense Ratio Comparison
ODDS has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is lower than CHAT's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
ODDS vs. CHAT - Dividend Comparison
ODDS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%, less than CHAT's 1.74% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF | 1.74% | 2.85% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ODDS Pacer BlueStar Digital Entertainment ETF | 0.75% | 2.59% | 0.56% | 0.66% | 0.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ODDS and CHAT have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CHAT has higher volatility (19.25%) compared to ODDS (6.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ODDS dropped -35.09% vs CHAT's -31.34%.
On 3-year performance, CHAT leads with 51.32% vs 7.05% for ODDS. On fees, ODDS is cheaper at 0.63% per year. On volatility, ODDS has been the lower-risk option at 6.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, CHAT has performed better with a 51.32% return vs 7.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ODDS is cheaper with a 0.63% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for CHAT.
CHAT has the higher dividend yield at 1.74%, compared with 0.75% for ODDS.
They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.63% for ODDS and 0.75% for CHAT.
CHAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.34 vs -0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ODDS and CHAT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer