ODDS vs. BAMU
ODDS (Pacer BlueStar Digital Entertainment ETF) and BAMU (Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ODDS is a Technology Equities fund tracking the BlueStar Global Online Gambling, Video Gaming and eSports Index, while BAMU is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Brookstone. ODDS is passively managed, while BAMU is actively managed. Over the past year, ODDS returned -19.58% vs 2.87% for BAMU. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ODDS charges 0.63%/yr vs 1.09%/yr for BAMU.
Performance
ODDS vs. BAMU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ODDS achieves a -18.34% return, which is significantly lower than BAMU's 1.18% return.
ODDS
- 1D
- -1.21%
- 1M
- -2.24%
- YTD
- -18.34%
- 6M
- -17.81%
- 1Y
- -19.58%
- 3Y*
- 7.05%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BAMU
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.16%
- YTD
- 1.18%
- 6M
- 1.29%
- 1Y
- 2.87%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ODDS vs. BAMU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ODDS Pacer BlueStar Digital Entertainment ETF | -18.34% | 16.71% | 27.61% | 10.92% |
BAMU Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF | 1.18% | 3.21% | 4.14% | 1.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between ODDS and BAMU is -0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2023 | 0.01 |
The correlation between ODDS and BAMU shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (1 year) to 0.01 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ODDS vs. BAMU — Risk / Return Rank
ODDS
BAMU
ODDS vs. BAMU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer BlueStar Digital Entertainment ETF (ODDS) and Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ODDS | BAMU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -5.89 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -9.94 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.85 | 2.41 | -1.56 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.56 | 24.37 | -24.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.94 | 96.52 | -97.46 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ODDS vs. BAMU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ODDS drawdown since its inception was -35.09%, which is greater than BAMU's maximum drawdown of -0.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ODDS and BAMU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ODDS | BAMU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.09% | -0.36% | -34.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.09% | -0.12% | -34.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.09% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.89% | 0.00% | -31.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.40% | -0.02% | -9.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.90% | 0.03% | +20.87% |
Volatility
ODDS vs. BAMU - Volatility Comparison
Pacer BlueStar Digital Entertainment ETF (ODDS) has a higher volatility of 6.79% compared to Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU) at 0.09%. This indicates that ODDS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BAMU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ODDS | BAMU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.79% | 0.09% | +6.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.66% | 0.39% | +16.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.69% | 0.58% | +20.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.86% | 0.87% | +23.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.86% | 0.87% | +23.99% |
ODDS vs. BAMU - Expense Ratio Comparison
ODDS has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is lower than BAMU's 1.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
ODDS vs. BAMU - Dividend Comparison
ODDS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%, less than BAMU's 3.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAMU Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF | 3.05% | 3.20% | 3.97% | 0.84% | 0.00% |
ODDS Pacer BlueStar Digital Entertainment ETF | 0.75% | 2.59% | 0.56% | 0.66% | 0.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ODDS and BAMU have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ODDS has higher volatility (6.79%) compared to BAMU (0.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ODDS dropped -35.09% vs BAMU's -0.36%.
On 1-year performance, BAMU leads with 2.87% vs -19.58% for ODDS. On fees, ODDS is cheaper at 0.63% per year. On volatility, BAMU has been the lower-risk option at 0.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, BAMU has performed better with a 2.87% return vs -19.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ODDS is cheaper with a 0.63% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for BAMU.
BAMU has the higher dividend yield at 3.05%, compared with 0.75% for ODDS.
ODDS is categorized as Technology Equities, while BAMU is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Brookstone. Their fees differ too: 0.63% for ODDS and 1.09% for BAMU.
BAMU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.94 vs -0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ODDS and BAMU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer