OCTZ vs. JUNZ

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

OCTZ (TrueShares Structured Outcome (October) ETF) and JUNZ (TrueShares Structured Outcome (June) ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds from TrueShares. OCTZ is actively managed, while JUNZ is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, OCTZ returned 11.10%/yr vs 9.84%/yr for JUNZ. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. Both charge a 0.79% expense ratio.

Performance

OCTZ vs. JUNZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TrueShares Structured Outcome (October) ETF (OCTZ) and TrueShares Structured Outcome (June) ETF (JUNZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with OCTZ having a 8.27% return and JUNZ slightly higher at 8.42%.

OCTZ

• 1D: -0.44%
• 1M: 4.25%
• YTD: 8.27%
• 6M: 8.27%
• 1Y: 20.60%
• 3Y*: 16.44%
• 5Y*: 11.10%
• 10Y*: —

JUNZ

• 1D: -0.40%
• 1M: 4.04%
• YTD: 8.42%
• 6M: 8.23%
• 1Y: 21.10%
• 3Y*: 16.22%
• 5Y*: 9.84%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OCTZ vs. JUNZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
OCTZ TrueShares Structured Outcome (October) ETF	8.27%	12.89%	18.89%	18.18%	-10.23%	10.20%
JUNZ TrueShares Structured Outcome (June) ETF	8.42%	12.83%	17.32%	17.28%	-12.97%	9.81%

Correlation

The correlation between OCTZ and JUNZ is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.98
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.99
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.98
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 2, 2021	0.98

The correlation between OCTZ and JUNZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

OCTZ vs. JUNZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	OCTZ	JUNZ
Technology	35.3%	32.7%
Financial Services	13.4%	13.7%
Consumer Cyclical	10.6%	10.7%
Communication Services	9.9%	9.5%
Healthcare	8.8%	10.7%
Industrials	7.8%	7.3%
Consumer Defensive	5.2%	5.8%
Energy	3.0%	3.2%
Utilities	2.5%	2.6%
Real Estate	2.0%	2.2%
Basic Materials	1.6%	1.8%

Return for Risk

OCTZ vs. JUNZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OCTZ

OCTZ Risk / Return Rank: 65
OCTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
OCTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
OCTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 66
OCTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
OCTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 66

JUNZ

JUNZ Risk / Return Rank: 61
JUNZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
JUNZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
JUNZ Omega Ratio Rank: 63
JUNZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
JUNZ Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OCTZ vs. JUNZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrueShares Structured Outcome (October) ETF (OCTZ) and TrueShares Structured Outcome (June) ETF (JUNZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	OCTZ	JUNZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.21	2.12	+0.08
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.08	2.96	+0.12
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.38	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.83	2.56	+0.27
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.00	11.27	+0.73
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

OCTZ vs. JUNZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OCTZ Sharpe Ratio is 2.21, which is comparable to the JUNZ Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OCTZ and JUNZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	OCTZ	JUNZ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.21	2.12	+0.08
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.90	0.84	+0.06
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.07	0.85	+0.22

Drawdowns

OCTZ vs. JUNZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OCTZ drawdown since its inception was -15.82%, smaller than the maximum JUNZ drawdown of -17.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OCTZ and JUNZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	OCTZ	JUNZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.82%	-17.88%	+2.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.31%	-8.27%	+0.96%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.07%	-14.06%	-0.01%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-15.82%	-17.88%	+2.06%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.44%	-0.40%	-0.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.16%	-4.27%	+1.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.72%	1.88%	-0.16%

Volatility

OCTZ vs. JUNZ - Volatility Comparison

TrueShares Structured Outcome (October) ETF (OCTZ) and TrueShares Structured Outcome (June) ETF (JUNZ) have volatilities of 2.47% and 2.45%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	OCTZ	JUNZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.47%	2.45%	+0.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.26%	7.85%	-0.59%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.39%	10.01%	-0.62%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.40%	11.74%	+0.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.37%	11.73%	+0.64%

OCTZ vs. JUNZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both OCTZ and JUNZ have an expense ratio of 0.79%.

Dividends

OCTZ vs. JUNZ - Dividend Comparison

OCTZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.69%, more than JUNZ's 2.12% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
JUNZ TrueShares Structured Outcome (June) ETF	2.12%	2.30%	3.97%	6.03%	0.56%	0.32%
OCTZ TrueShares Structured Outcome (October) ETF	3.69%	3.99%	1.26%	3.28%	0.67%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both OCTZ and JUNZ in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.98, OCTZ and JUNZ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, OCTZ or JUNZ?

OCTZ has higher volatility (2.47%) compared to JUNZ (2.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OCTZ dropped -15.82% vs JUNZ's -17.88%.

Which ETF is better, OCTZ or JUNZ?

On 5-year performance, OCTZ leads with 11.10% vs 9.84% for JUNZ. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, OCTZ or JUNZ?

Over the 5-year period, OCTZ has performed better with a 11.10% return vs 9.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, OCTZ or JUNZ?

OCTZ and JUNZ have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, OCTZ or JUNZ?

OCTZ has the higher dividend yield at 3.69%, compared with 2.12% for JUNZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

OCTZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.