OCTZ vs. AUGZ
OCTZ (TrueShares Structured Outcome (October) ETF) and AUGZ (TrueShares Structured Outcome (August) ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds from TrueShares. OCTZ is actively managed, while AUGZ is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, OCTZ returned 10.79%/yr vs 10.53%/yr for AUGZ. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. Both charge a 0.79% expense ratio.
Performance
OCTZ vs. AUGZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with OCTZ having a 7.18% return and AUGZ slightly lower at 7.08%.
OCTZ
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- -0.02%
- YTD
- 7.18%
- 6M
- 6.91%
- 1Y
- 19.51%
- 3Y*
- 15.55%
- 5Y*
- 10.79%
- 10Y*
- —
AUGZ
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- 0.08%
- YTD
- 7.08%
- 6M
- 6.74%
- 1Y
- 19.59%
- 3Y*
- 15.58%
- 5Y*
- 10.53%
- 10Y*
- —
OCTZ vs. AUGZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OCTZ TrueShares Structured Outcome (October) ETF | 7.18% | 12.89% | 18.89% | 18.18% | -10.23% | 20.49% | 8.44% |
AUGZ TrueShares Structured Outcome (August) ETF | 7.08% | 13.49% | 17.99% | 17.32% | -10.41% | 20.74% | 9.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between OCTZ and AUGZ is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2020 | 0.98 |
The correlation between OCTZ and AUGZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OCTZ vs. AUGZ — Risk / Return Rank
OCTZ
AUGZ
OCTZ vs. AUGZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrueShares Structured Outcome (October) ETF (OCTZ) and TrueShares Structured Outcome (August) ETF (AUGZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| OCTZ | AUGZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.35 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.68 | 2.72 | -0.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.03 | 11.29 | -0.25 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
OCTZ vs. AUGZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OCTZ drawdown since its inception was -15.82%, roughly equal to the maximum AUGZ drawdown of -15.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OCTZ and AUGZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OCTZ | AUGZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.82% | -15.67% | -0.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.31% | -7.23% | -0.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.07% | -14.52% | +0.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.82% | -15.67% | -0.15% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.45% | -1.64% | +0.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.15% | -3.10% | -0.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.77% | 1.74% | +0.03% |
Volatility
OCTZ vs. AUGZ - Volatility Comparison
TrueShares Structured Outcome (October) ETF (OCTZ) and TrueShares Structured Outcome (August) ETF (AUGZ) have volatilities of 3.82% and 3.84%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OCTZ | AUGZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.82% | 3.84% | -0.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.98% | 7.95% | +0.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.94% | 10.02% | -0.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.48% | 12.05% | +0.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.41% | 12.14% | +0.27% |
OCTZ vs. AUGZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both OCTZ and AUGZ have an expense ratio of 0.79%.
Dividends
OCTZ vs. AUGZ - Dividend Comparison
OCTZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.72%, more than AUGZ's 3.39% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AUGZ TrueShares Structured Outcome (August) ETF | 3.39% | 3.63% | 4.08% | 3.42% | 0.41% |
OCTZ TrueShares Structured Outcome (October) ETF | 3.72% | 3.99% | 1.26% | 3.28% | 0.67% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, OCTZ and AUGZ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
AUGZ has higher volatility (3.84%) compared to OCTZ (3.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OCTZ dropped -15.82% vs AUGZ's -15.67%.
On 5-year performance, OCTZ leads with 10.79% vs 10.53% for AUGZ. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, OCTZ has performed better with a 10.79% return vs 10.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
OCTZ and AUGZ have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.
OCTZ has the higher dividend yield at 3.72%, compared with 3.39% for AUGZ.
OCTZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OCTZ and AUGZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer