OCTZ vs. APRZ
OCTZ (TrueShares Structured Outcome (October) ETF) and APRZ (TrueShares Structured Outcome (April) ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds from TrueShares. OCTZ is actively managed, while APRZ is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, OCTZ returned 10.79%/yr vs 10.94%/yr for APRZ. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. Both charge a 0.79% expense ratio.
Performance
OCTZ vs. APRZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OCTZ achieves a 7.18% return, which is significantly higher than APRZ's 6.47% return.
OCTZ
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- -0.02%
- YTD
- 7.18%
- 6M
- 6.91%
- 1Y
- 19.51%
- 3Y*
- 15.55%
- 5Y*
- 10.79%
- 10Y*
- —
APRZ
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- 0.16%
- YTD
- 6.47%
- 6M
- 6.08%
- 1Y
- 19.26%
- 3Y*
- 15.36%
- 5Y*
- 10.94%
- 10Y*
- —
OCTZ vs. APRZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OCTZ TrueShares Structured Outcome (October) ETF | 7.18% | 12.89% | 18.89% | 18.18% | -10.23% | 15.06% |
APRZ TrueShares Structured Outcome (April) ETF | 6.47% | 12.97% | 18.46% | 22.23% | -11.43% | 13.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between OCTZ and APRZ is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2021 | 0.99 |
The correlation between OCTZ and APRZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OCTZ vs. APRZ — Risk / Return Rank
OCTZ
APRZ
OCTZ vs. APRZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrueShares Structured Outcome (October) ETF (OCTZ) and TrueShares Structured Outcome (April) ETF (APRZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| OCTZ | APRZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.33 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.68 | 2.19 | +0.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.03 | 9.47 | +1.56 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
OCTZ vs. APRZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OCTZ drawdown since its inception was -15.82%, smaller than the maximum APRZ drawdown of -18.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OCTZ and APRZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OCTZ | APRZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.82% | -18.15% | +2.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.31% | -8.85% | +1.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.07% | -15.15% | +1.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.82% | -18.15% | +2.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.45% | -1.41% | -0.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.15% | -3.61% | +0.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.77% | 2.04% | -0.27% |
Volatility
OCTZ vs. APRZ - Volatility Comparison
TrueShares Structured Outcome (October) ETF (OCTZ) has a higher volatility of 3.82% compared to TrueShares Structured Outcome (April) ETF (APRZ) at 3.57%. This indicates that OCTZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than APRZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OCTZ | APRZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.82% | 3.57% | +0.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.98% | 8.57% | -0.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.94% | 10.63% | -0.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.48% | 12.59% | -0.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.41% | 12.44% | -0.03% |
OCTZ vs. APRZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both OCTZ and APRZ have an expense ratio of 0.79%.
Dividends
OCTZ vs. APRZ - Dividend Comparison
OCTZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.72%, more than APRZ's 3.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APRZ TrueShares Structured Outcome (April) ETF | 3.15% | 3.35% | 2.78% | 2.89% | 0.59% |
OCTZ TrueShares Structured Outcome (October) ETF | 3.72% | 3.99% | 1.26% | 3.28% | 0.67% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.98, OCTZ and APRZ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
OCTZ has higher volatility (3.82%) compared to APRZ (3.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OCTZ dropped -15.82% vs APRZ's -18.15%.
On 5-year performance, APRZ leads with 10.94% vs 10.79% for OCTZ. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. On volatility, APRZ has been the lower-risk option at 3.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, APRZ has performed better with a 10.94% return vs 10.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
OCTZ and APRZ have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.
OCTZ has the higher dividend yield at 3.72%, compared with 3.15% for APRZ.
OCTZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OCTZ and APRZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer