PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JUNZ vs. AUGZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JUNZ vs. AUGZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TrueShares Structured Outcome (June) ETF (JUNZ) and TrueShares Structured Outcome (August) ETF (AUGZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with JUNZ having a 8.42% return and AUGZ slightly lower at 8.27%.


JUNZ

1D
-0.40%
1M
4.04%
YTD
8.42%
6M
8.23%
1Y
21.10%
3Y*
16.22%
5Y*
9.84%
10Y*

AUGZ

1D
-0.55%
1M
4.32%
YTD
8.27%
6M
8.18%
1Y
20.84%
3Y*
16.37%
5Y*
10.83%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JUNZ vs. AUGZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
JUNZ
TrueShares Structured Outcome (June) ETF
8.42%12.83%17.32%17.28%-12.97%9.81%
AUGZ
TrueShares Structured Outcome (August) ETF
8.27%13.49%17.99%17.32%-10.41%10.37%

Correlation

The correlation between JUNZ and AUGZ is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 2, 2021

0.98

The correlation between JUNZ and AUGZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JUNZ vs. AUGZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JUNZ
JUNZ Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
JUNZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JUNZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
JUNZ Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
JUNZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
JUNZ Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

AUGZ
AUGZ Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
AUGZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AUGZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
AUGZ Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
AUGZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
AUGZ Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JUNZ vs. AUGZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrueShares Structured Outcome (June) ETF (JUNZ) and TrueShares Structured Outcome (August) ETF (AUGZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JUNZAUGZDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.12

2.21

-0.09

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.96

3.05

-0.09

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.40

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.56

2.89

-0.33

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.27

12.46

-1.18

JUNZ vs. AUGZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JUNZ Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is comparable to the AUGZ Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JUNZ and AUGZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JUNZAUGZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.12

2.21

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

0.91

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.85

1.08

-0.23

Drawdowns

JUNZ vs. AUGZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JUNZ drawdown since its inception was -17.88%, which is greater than AUGZ's maximum drawdown of -15.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JUNZ and AUGZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JUNZAUGZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.88%

-15.67%

-2.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.27%

-7.23%

-1.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.06%

-14.52%

+0.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.88%

-15.67%

-2.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.40%

-0.55%

+0.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.27%

-3.11%

-1.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.88%

1.68%

+0.20%

Volatility

JUNZ vs. AUGZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for TrueShares Structured Outcome (June) ETF (JUNZ) is 2.45%, while TrueShares Structured Outcome (August) ETF (AUGZ) has a volatility of 2.60%. This indicates that JUNZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AUGZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JUNZAUGZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.45%

2.60%

-0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.85%

7.25%

+0.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.01%

9.50%

+0.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.74%

11.97%

-0.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.73%

12.10%

-0.37%

JUNZ vs. AUGZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both JUNZ and AUGZ have an expense ratio of 0.79%.


Dividends

JUNZ vs. AUGZ - Dividend Comparison

JUNZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.12%, less than AUGZ's 3.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
AUGZ
TrueShares Structured Outcome (August) ETF
3.35%3.63%4.08%3.42%0.41%0.00%
JUNZ
TrueShares Structured Outcome (June) ETF
2.12%2.30%3.97%6.03%0.56%0.32%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, JUNZ and AUGZ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

AUGZ has higher volatility (2.60%) compared to JUNZ (2.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JUNZ dropped -17.88% vs AUGZ's -15.67%.

On 5-year performance, AUGZ leads with 10.83% vs 9.84% for JUNZ. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. On volatility, JUNZ has been the lower-risk option at 2.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, AUGZ has performed better with a 10.83% return vs 9.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JUNZ and AUGZ have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.

AUGZ has the higher dividend yield at 3.35%, compared with 2.12% for JUNZ.

JUNZ tracks S&P 500 Price Return Index, while AUGZ tracks S&P 500 Index.

AUGZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JUNZ and AUGZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer