PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JUNZ vs. DECZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JUNZ vs. DECZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TrueShares Structured Outcome (June) ETF (JUNZ) and TrueShares Structured Outcome (December) ETF (DECZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with JUNZ having a 8.85% return and DECZ slightly lower at 8.72%.


JUNZ

1D
0.10%
1M
4.10%
YTD
8.85%
6M
9.06%
1Y
22.21%
3Y*
16.37%
5Y*
10.07%
10Y*

DECZ

1D
0.15%
1M
4.24%
YTD
8.72%
6M
8.83%
1Y
21.38%
3Y*
16.49%
5Y*
11.48%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JUNZ vs. DECZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
JUNZ
TrueShares Structured Outcome (June) ETF
8.85%12.83%17.32%17.28%-12.97%9.81%
DECZ
TrueShares Structured Outcome (December) ETF
8.72%12.34%18.89%18.32%-8.93%9.89%

Correlation

The correlation between JUNZ and DECZ is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 2, 2021

0.98

The correlation between JUNZ and DECZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

JUNZ vs. DECZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JUNZ
DECZ

Technology

32.7%
35.3%

Financial Services

13.7%
13.4%

Healthcare

10.7%
8.8%

Consumer Cyclical

10.7%
10.6%

Communication Services

9.5%
9.9%

Industrials

7.3%
7.8%

Consumer Defensive

5.8%
5.2%

Energy

3.2%
3.0%

Utilities

2.6%
2.5%

Real Estate

2.2%
2.0%

Basic Materials

1.8%
1.6%

Technology

JUNZ
32.7%
DECZ
35.3%

Financial Services

JUNZ
13.7%
DECZ
13.4%

Healthcare

JUNZ
10.7%
DECZ
8.8%

Consumer Cyclical

JUNZ
10.7%
DECZ
10.6%

Communication Services

JUNZ
9.5%
DECZ
9.9%

Industrials

JUNZ
7.3%
DECZ
7.8%

Consumer Defensive

JUNZ
5.8%
DECZ
5.2%

Energy

JUNZ
3.2%
DECZ
3.0%

Utilities

JUNZ
2.6%
DECZ
2.5%

Real Estate

JUNZ
2.2%
DECZ
2.0%

Basic Materials

JUNZ
1.8%
DECZ
1.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JUNZ vs. DECZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JUNZ
JUNZ Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
JUNZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JUNZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
JUNZ Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
JUNZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
JUNZ Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

DECZ
DECZ Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
DECZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DECZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
DECZ Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
DECZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
DECZ Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JUNZ vs. DECZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrueShares Structured Outcome (June) ETF (JUNZ) and TrueShares Structured Outcome (December) ETF (DECZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JUNZDECZDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.23

2.25

-0.02

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.10

3.15

-0.05

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.41

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.73

2.87

-0.14

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.04

12.13

-0.09

JUNZ vs. DECZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JUNZ Sharpe Ratio is 2.23, which is comparable to the DECZ Sharpe Ratio of 2.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JUNZ and DECZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JUNZDECZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.23

2.25

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

0.92

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.86

1.01

-0.15

Drawdowns

JUNZ vs. DECZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JUNZ drawdown since its inception was -17.88%, which is greater than DECZ's maximum drawdown of -16.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JUNZ and DECZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JUNZDECZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.88%

-16.57%

-1.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.27%

-7.53%

-0.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.06%

-14.24%

+0.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.88%

-16.57%

-1.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.28%

-3.07%

-1.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.88%

1.78%

+0.10%

Volatility

JUNZ vs. DECZ - Volatility Comparison

TrueShares Structured Outcome (June) ETF (JUNZ) and TrueShares Structured Outcome (December) ETF (DECZ) have volatilities of 2.44% and 2.44%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JUNZDECZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.44%

2.44%

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.86%

7.18%

+0.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.00%

9.55%

+0.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.74%

12.59%

-0.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.74%

12.40%

-0.66%

JUNZ vs. DECZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both JUNZ and DECZ have an expense ratio of 0.79%.


Dividends

JUNZ vs. DECZ - Dividend Comparison

JUNZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.11%, less than DECZ's 3.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
DECZ
TrueShares Structured Outcome (December) ETF
3.01%3.28%2.55%1.23%1.44%0.46%
JUNZ
TrueShares Structured Outcome (June) ETF
2.11%2.30%3.97%6.03%0.56%0.32%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, JUNZ and DECZ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

DECZ has higher volatility (2.44%) compared to JUNZ (2.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JUNZ dropped -17.88% vs DECZ's -16.57%.

On 5-year performance, DECZ leads with 11.48% vs 10.07% for JUNZ. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DECZ has performed better with a 11.48% return vs 10.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JUNZ and DECZ have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.

DECZ has the higher dividend yield at 3.01%, compared with 2.11% for JUNZ.

JUNZ tracks S&P 500 Price Return Index, while DECZ tracks S&P 500.

DECZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs 2.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JUNZ and DECZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer