OCTB vs. PJUN
OCTB (Aptus October Buffer ETF) and PJUN (Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - June) are both Defined Outcome funds. OCTB is actively managed, while PJUN is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. OCTB charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for PJUN.
Performance
OCTB vs. PJUN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OCTB achieves a 5.52% return, which is significantly higher than PJUN's 2.44% return.
OCTB
- 1D
- -0.56%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 5.52%
- 6M
- 5.21%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PJUN
- 1D
- -0.60%
- 1M
- -0.92%
- YTD
- 2.44%
- 6M
- 2.36%
- 1Y
- 9.24%
- 3Y*
- 11.06%
- 5Y*
- 6.68%
- 10Y*
- —
OCTB vs. PJUN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
OCTB Aptus October Buffer ETF | 5.52% | 2.37% |
PJUN Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - June | 2.44% | 1.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between OCTB and PJUN is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2025 | 0.89 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OCTB vs. PJUN — Risk / Return Rank
OCTB
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
PJUN
OCTB vs. PJUN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aptus October Buffer ETF (OCTB) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - June (PJUN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| OCTB | PJUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.41 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.32 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 17.15 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
OCTB vs. PJUN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OCTB drawdown since its inception was -4.79%, smaller than the maximum PJUN drawdown of -16.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OCTB and PJUN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OCTB | PJUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.79% | -16.31% | +11.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.79% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -10.09% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -12.51% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.82% | -1.33% | +0.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.69% | -1.86% | +1.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.54% | — |
Volatility
OCTB vs. PJUN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OCTB | PJUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.48% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 4.03% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.26% | 4.93% | +2.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.26% | 8.25% | -0.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.26% | 9.72% | -2.46% |
OCTB vs. PJUN - Expense Ratio Comparison
OCTB has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than PJUN's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
OCTB vs. PJUN - Dividend Comparison
Neither OCTB nor PJUN has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
OCTB and PJUN have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, OCTB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
OCTB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for PJUN.
OCTB and PJUN have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Aptus Capital Advisors and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for OCTB and 0.79% for PJUN.
Find the right allocation for OCTB and PJUN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer