OCTB vs. JULB
OCTB (Aptus October Buffer ETF) and JULB (Aptus July Buffer ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds from Aptus. Both are actively managed. Their 0.96 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. Both charge a 0.25% expense ratio.
Performance
OCTB vs. JULB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OCTB achieves a 7.75% return, which is significantly lower than JULB's 8.79% return.
OCTB
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- 1.30%
- 6M
- 6.50%
- YTD
- 7.75%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
JULB
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- 1.23%
- 6M
- 7.52%
- YTD
- 8.79%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $147.19K | $170.46K | $229.15K | |
| $69.66K | $87.45K | $69.55K |
OCTB vs. JULB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
OCTB Aptus October Buffer ETF | 7.75% | 2.37% |
JULB Aptus July Buffer ETF | 8.79% | 2.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between OCTB and JULB is 0.96 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2025 | 0.96 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OCTB vs. JULB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aptus October Buffer ETF (OCTB) and Aptus July Buffer ETF (JULB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
OCTB vs. JULB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OCTB drawdown since its inception was -4.79%, smaller than the maximum JULB drawdown of -5.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OCTB and JULB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OCTB | JULB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.79% | -5.24% | +0.45% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.65% | -0.78% | +0.13% |
Volatility
OCTB vs. JULB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OCTB | JULB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.15% | 6.83% | +0.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.15% | 6.83% | +0.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.15% | 6.83% | +0.32% |
OCTB vs. JULB - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both OCTB and JULB have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
OCTB vs. JULB - Dividend Comparison
Neither OCTB nor JULB has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, OCTB and JULB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
OCTB and JULB have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.
OCTB and JULB have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
Find the right allocation for OCTB and JULB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer