PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OCTB vs. ADME
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OCTB vs. ADME - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aptus October Buffer ETF (OCTB) and Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF (ADME). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OCTB achieves a 6.11% return, which is significantly lower than ADME's 8.62% return.


OCTB

1D
-0.15%
1M
0.56%
YTD
6.11%
6M
6.02%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ADME

1D
-0.38%
1M
-0.16%
YTD
8.62%
6M
8.08%
1Y
19.81%
3Y*
16.57%
5Y*
7.80%
10Y*
8.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OCTB vs. ADME - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
OCTB
Aptus October Buffer ETF
6.11%2.37%
ADME
Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF
8.62%1.03%

Correlation

The correlation between OCTB and ADME is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2025

0.93

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OCTB vs. ADME — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OCTB

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


ADME
ADME Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
ADME Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ADME Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
ADME Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
ADME Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
ADME Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OCTB vs. ADME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aptus October Buffer ETF (OCTB) and Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF (ADME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


OCTBADMEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.07

OCTB vs. ADME - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

OCTB vs. ADME - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OCTB drawdown since its inception was -4.79%, smaller than the maximum ADME drawdown of -27.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OCTB and ADME.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OCTBADMEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.79%

-27.49%

+22.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.26%

-1.80%

+1.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.69%

-7.89%

+7.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.79%

Volatility

OCTB vs. ADME - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OCTBADMEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.24%

10.68%

-3.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.24%

12.99%

-5.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.24%

14.45%

-7.21%

OCTB vs. ADME - Expense Ratio Comparison

OCTB has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than ADME's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

OCTB vs. ADME - Dividend Comparison

OCTB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ADME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
ADME
Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF
0.38%0.38%0.47%0.78%0.73%0.26%0.41%0.70%0.86%0.32%0.69%
OCTB
Aptus October Buffer ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, OCTB and ADME move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, OCTB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

OCTB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for ADME.

ADME has the higher dividend yield at 0.38%, compared with 0.00% for OCTB.

OCTB is categorized as Defined Outcome, while ADME is Hedge Fund. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for OCTB and 0.79% for ADME.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OCTB and ADME

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer