OCIO vs. GDMA

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about ClearShares OCIO ETF (OCIO) and Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF (GDMA).

OCIO and GDMA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. OCIO is an actively managed fund by ClearShares LLC. It was launched on Jun 27, 2017. GDMA is an actively managed fund by Gadsden. It was launched on Nov 14, 2018.

Performance

OCIO vs. GDMA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ClearShares OCIO ETF (OCIO) and Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF (GDMA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

OCIO vs. GDMA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
OCIO ClearShares OCIO ETF	-1.52%	12.68%	12.76%	12.03%	-12.49%	13.20%	11.54%	18.56%	-8.12%
GDMA Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF	5.56%	25.29%	7.44%	1.72%	-2.08%	3.95%	21.08%	11.59%	-3.93%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OCIO achieves a -1.52% return, which is significantly lower than GDMA's 5.56% return.

OCIO

• 1D: 2.14%
• 1M: -4.52%
• YTD: -1.52%
• 6M: 0.60%
• 1Y: 13.31%
• 3Y*: 10.77%
• 5Y*: 6.01%
• 10Y*: —

GDMA

• 1D: -0.16%
• 1M: -5.27%
• YTD: 5.56%
• 6M: 8.64%
• 1Y: 30.39%
• 3Y*: 14.82%
• 5Y*: 7.72%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OCIO vs. GDMA - Expense Ratio Comparison

OCIO has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is lower than GDMA's 0.77% expense ratio.

GDMA

Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF

OCIO

ClearShares OCIO ETF

Return for Risk

OCIO vs. GDMA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OCIO

OCIO Risk / Return Rank: 64
OCIO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
OCIO Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
OCIO Omega Ratio Rank: 63
OCIO Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
OCIO Martin Ratio Rank: 70

GDMA

GDMA Risk / Return Rank: 96
GDMA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
GDMA Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
GDMA Omega Ratio Rank: 96
GDMA Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
GDMA Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OCIO vs. GDMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ClearShares OCIO ETF (OCIO) and Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF (GDMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	OCIO	GDMA	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.06	2.52	-1.46
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.61	3.29	-1.68
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.48	-0.25
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.54	4.72	-3.18
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.09	14.01	-6.92
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

OCIO vs. GDMA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OCIO Sharpe Ratio is 1.06, which is lower than the GDMA Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OCIO and GDMA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	OCIO	GDMA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.06	2.52	-1.46
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.57	0.82	-0.25
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.61	0.85	-0.24

Correlation

The correlation between OCIO and GDMA is 0.48, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

OCIO vs. GDMA - Dividend Comparison

OCIO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.53%, more than GDMA's 2.65% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
OCIO ClearShares OCIO ETF	10.53%	10.27%	1.87%	2.32%	3.21%	2.83%	2.90%	2.22%	0.01%	1.68%
GDMA Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF	2.65%	2.79%	2.32%	4.14%	1.18%	2.10%	0.62%	3.17%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

OCIO vs. GDMA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OCIO drawdown since its inception was -24.21%, which is greater than GDMA's maximum drawdown of -16.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OCIO and GDMA.

Drawdown Indicators

	OCIO	GDMA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.21%	-16.66%	-7.55%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.58%	-6.44%	-2.14%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.75%	-12.74%	-6.01%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.99%	-6.06%	+1.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.51%	-3.78%	-0.73%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.86%	2.17%	-0.31%

Volatility

OCIO vs. GDMA - Volatility Comparison

ClearShares OCIO ETF (OCIO) has a higher volatility of 4.56% compared to Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF (GDMA) at 4.01%. This indicates that OCIO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GDMA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	OCIO	GDMA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.56%	4.01%	+0.55%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.65%	9.88%	-2.23%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.59%	12.12%	+0.47%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.51%	9.44%	+1.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.36%	10.82%	+0.54%