PortfoliosLab logo
OCIO vs. AOM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between OCIO and AOM is 0.20, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

OCIO vs. AOM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ClearShares OCIO ETF (OCIO) and iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF (AOM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Daily Std Dev

OCIO:

4.30%

AOM:

8.31%

Max Drawdown

OCIO:

-0.24%

AOM:

-19.96%

Current Drawdown

OCIO:

0.00%

AOM:

-1.01%

Returns By Period


OCIO

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

AOM

YTD

1.88%

1M

3.55%

6M

0.51%

1Y

7.26%

5Y*

5.47%

10Y*

4.61%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


OCIO vs. AOM - Expense Ratio Comparison

OCIO has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than AOM's 0.25% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

OCIO vs. AOM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OCIO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of OCIO is 7474
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of OCIO is 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of OCIO is 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of OCIO is 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of OCIO is 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of OCIO is 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

AOM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of AOM is 8383
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of AOM is 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of AOM is 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of AOM is 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of AOM is 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of AOM is 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

OCIO vs. AOM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ClearShares OCIO ETF (OCIO) and iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF (AOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Loading data...

Dividends

OCIO vs. AOM - Dividend Comparison

OCIO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.12%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
OCIO
ClearShares OCIO ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
AOM
iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF
3.12%3.10%2.79%2.27%1.56%2.02%2.66%2.53%3.31%2.14%1.98%2.08%

Drawdowns

OCIO vs. AOM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OCIO drawdown since its inception was -0.24%, smaller than the maximum AOM drawdown of -19.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OCIO and AOM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

OCIO vs. AOM - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...