OCIO vs. CTAP
OCIO (ClearShares OCIO ETF) and CTAP (Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. OCIO charges 0.61%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for CTAP.
Performance
OCIO vs. CTAP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OCIO achieves a 7.53% return, which is significantly lower than CTAP's 8.12% return.
OCIO
- 1D
- -0.90%
- 1M
- -1.51%
- 6M
- 5.62%
- YTD
- 7.53%
- 1Y
- 15.51%
- 3Y*
- 12.05%
- 5Y*
- 7.07%
- 10Y*
- —
CTAP
- 1D
- -1.33%
- 1M
- -2.44%
- 6M
- 4.27%
- YTD
- 8.12%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OCIO vs. CTAP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
OCIO ClearShares OCIO ETF | 7.53% | 0.43% |
CTAP Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF | 8.12% | 2.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between OCIO and CTAP is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2025 | 0.29 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OCIO vs. CTAP — Risk / Return Rank
OCIO
CTAP
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
OCIO vs. CTAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ClearShares OCIO ETF (OCIO) and Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| OCIO | CTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.23 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.29 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
OCIO vs. CTAP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OCIO drawdown since its inception was -24.21%, which is greater than CTAP's maximum drawdown of -20.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OCIO and CTAP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OCIO | CTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.21% | -20.48% | -3.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.98% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.32% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.75% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.24% | -15.31% | +13.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.40% | -4.61% | +0.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.67% | — | — |
Volatility
OCIO vs. CTAP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OCIO | CTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.97% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.30% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.98% | 24.35% | -13.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.85% | 24.35% | -13.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.43% | 24.35% | -12.92% |
OCIO vs. CTAP - Expense Ratio Comparison
OCIO has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than CTAP's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
OCIO vs. CTAP - Dividend Comparison
OCIO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.85%, more than CTAP's 1.84% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CTAP Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF | 1.84% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
OCIO ClearShares OCIO ETF | 9.85% | 10.27% | 1.87% | 2.32% | 3.21% | 2.83% | 2.90% | 2.22% | 0.01% | 1.68% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OCIO and CTAP have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CTAP is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CTAP is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for OCIO.
OCIO has the higher dividend yield at 9.85%, compared with 1.84% for CTAP.
They also come from different issuers: ClearShares LLC and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for OCIO and 0.10% for CTAP.
Find the right allocation for OCIO and CTAP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer