PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OCIO vs. BNDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OCIO vs. BNDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ClearShares OCIO ETF (OCIO) and Vanguard Total International Bond ETF (BNDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OCIO achieves a 10.00% return, which is significantly higher than BNDX's 1.04% return.


OCIO

1D
0.07%
1M
2.52%
YTD
10.00%
6M
9.92%
1Y
22.19%
3Y*
14.00%
5Y*
7.67%
10Y*

BNDX

1D
-0.17%
1M
0.67%
YTD
1.04%
6M
1.23%
1Y
2.08%
3Y*
4.14%
5Y*
0.42%
10Y*
1.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OCIO vs. BNDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
OCIO
ClearShares OCIO ETF
10.00%12.68%12.76%12.03%-12.49%13.20%11.54%18.56%-10.35%8.91%
BNDX
Vanguard Total International Bond ETF
1.04%2.86%3.57%8.77%-12.76%-2.29%4.65%7.87%2.81%0.83%

Correlation

The correlation between OCIO and BNDX is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2017

0.15

Over the past year, OCIO and BNDX have become more correlated (0.42) than their long-term average of 0.15, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OCIO vs. BNDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OCIO
OCIO Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
OCIO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OCIO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
OCIO Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
OCIO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
OCIO Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

BNDX
BNDX Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
BNDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNDX Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
BNDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNDX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OCIO vs. BNDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ClearShares OCIO ETF (OCIO) and Vanguard Total International Bond ETF (BNDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


OCIOBNDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.11

+0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.19

0.71

+2.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.68

1.97

+11.71

OCIO vs. BNDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OCIO Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is higher than the BNDX Sharpe Ratio of 0.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OCIO and BNDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

OCIO vs. BNDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OCIO drawdown since its inception was -24.21%, which is greater than BNDX's maximum drawdown of -16.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OCIO and BNDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OCIOBNDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.21%

-16.23%

-7.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.98%

-2.93%

-4.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.32%

-2.93%

-10.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.75%

-15.86%

-2.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.00%

+1.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.42%

-3.10%

-1.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.63%

1.06%

+0.57%

Volatility

OCIO vs. BNDX - Volatility Comparison

ClearShares OCIO ETF (OCIO) has a higher volatility of 4.69% compared to Vanguard Total International Bond ETF (BNDX) at 0.96%. This indicates that OCIO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BNDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OCIOBNDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.69%

0.96%

+3.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.71%

2.97%

+5.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.51%

3.46%

+7.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.76%

4.89%

+5.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.41%

4.10%

+7.31%

OCIO vs. BNDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

OCIO has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than BNDX's 0.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

OCIO vs. BNDX - Dividend Comparison

OCIO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.42%, more than BNDX's 4.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BNDX
Vanguard Total International Bond ETF
4.47%4.39%4.18%4.42%1.51%3.74%1.11%3.40%3.01%2.23%1.89%1.63%
OCIO
ClearShares OCIO ETF
9.42%10.27%1.87%2.32%3.21%2.83%2.90%2.22%0.01%1.68%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


OCIO and BNDX have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OCIO has higher volatility (4.69%) compared to BNDX (0.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OCIO dropped -24.21% vs BNDX's -16.23%.

On 5-year performance, OCIO leads with 7.67% vs 0.42% for BNDX. On fees, BNDX is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, BNDX has been the lower-risk option at 0.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, OCIO has performed better with a 7.67% return vs 0.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BNDX is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for OCIO.

OCIO has the higher dividend yield at 9.42%, compared with 4.47% for BNDX.

OCIO is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while BNDX is Global Bonds. They also come from different issuers: ClearShares LLC and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for OCIO and 0.07% for BNDX.

OCIO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OCIO and BNDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer