OBOR vs. KEMQ

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

OBOR (KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF) and KEMQ (KraneShares Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds from CICC - OBOR tracks the MSCI Global China Infrastructure Exposure while KEMQ tracks the Solactive Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, OBOR returned 0.17%/yr vs -4.20%/yr for KEMQ. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. OBOR charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for KEMQ.

Performance

OBOR vs. KEMQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF (OBOR) and KraneShares Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index ETF (KEMQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OBOR achieves a -2.21% return, which is significantly lower than KEMQ's 2.52% return.

OBOR

• 1D: -1.91%
• 1M: -4.31%
• YTD: -2.21%
• 6M: -2.99%
• 1Y: 12.55%
• 3Y*: 10.40%
• 5Y*: 0.17%
• 10Y*: —

KEMQ

• 1D: 0.38%
• 1M: 2.37%
• YTD: 2.52%
• 6M: 2.47%
• 1Y: 18.13%
• 3Y*: 23.10%
• 5Y*: -4.20%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OBOR vs. KEMQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
OBOR KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF	-2.21%	27.86%	8.55%	-7.91%	-21.96%	17.06%	13.47%	16.75%	-15.36%	1.75%
KEMQ KraneShares Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index ETF	2.52%	56.28%	13.81%	0.77%	-38.09%	-27.31%	39.26%	28.26%	-25.52%	1.43%

Correlation

The correlation between OBOR and KEMQ is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.49
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.61
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.65
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2017	0.69

Over the past year, the correlation between OBOR and KEMQ has dropped to 0.49 - well below their long-term average of 0.69, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

OBOR vs. KEMQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	OBOR	KEMQ
Basic Materials	26.6%	-
Industrials	25.1%	2.1%
Financial Services	23.1%	2.5%
Utilities	14.1%	-
Energy	8.5%	-
Consumer Cyclical	0.4%	30.6%
Healthcare	0.2%	3.3%
Communication Services	0.2%	20.2%
Consumer Defensive	-	3.3%
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	39.1%

Return for Risk

OBOR vs. KEMQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OBOR

OBOR Risk / Return Rank: 22
OBOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
OBOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
OBOR Omega Ratio Rank: 23
OBOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
OBOR Martin Ratio Rank: 22

KEMQ

KEMQ Risk / Return Rank: 21
KEMQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
KEMQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
KEMQ Omega Ratio Rank: 21
KEMQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
KEMQ Martin Ratio Rank: 20

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OBOR vs. KEMQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF (OBOR) and KraneShares Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index ETF (KEMQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	OBOR	KEMQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.75	0.67	+0.08
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.09	1.08	+0.01
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.14	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.92	0.83	+0.09
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.57	2.14	+0.43

OBOR vs. KEMQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OBOR Sharpe Ratio is 0.75, which is comparable to the KEMQ Sharpe Ratio of 0.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OBOR and KEMQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

OBOR vs. KEMQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OBOR drawdown since its inception was -41.54%, smaller than the maximum KEMQ drawdown of -70.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OBOR and KEMQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	OBOR	KEMQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.54%	-70.72%	+29.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.72%	-21.94%	+8.22%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.06%	-21.94%	+3.88%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.00%	-66.02%	+32.02%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.72%	-31.15%	+17.43%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.94%	-35.64%	+19.70%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.90%	8.51%	-3.61%

Volatility

OBOR vs. KEMQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF (OBOR) is 7.20%, while KraneShares Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index ETF (KEMQ) has a volatility of 11.75%. This indicates that OBOR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KEMQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	OBOR	KEMQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.20%	11.75%	-4.55%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.97%	22.81%	-7.84%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.92%	27.35%	-10.43%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.23%	32.14%	-15.91%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.56%	29.67%	-11.11%

OBOR vs. KEMQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

OBOR has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than KEMQ's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

OBOR vs. KEMQ - Dividend Comparison

OBOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.98%, less than KEMQ's 5.14% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
KEMQ KraneShares Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index ETF	5.14%	5.27%	0.73%	0.29%	0.00%	0.28%	2.28%	1.76%	0.00%	0.00%
OBOR KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF	1.98%	1.94%	3.87%	3.40%	4.75%	3.26%	2.04%	4.33%	0.02%	0.10%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both OBOR and KEMQ in my portfolio?

OBOR and KEMQ have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, OBOR or KEMQ?

KEMQ has higher volatility (11.75%) compared to OBOR (7.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OBOR dropped -41.54% vs KEMQ's -70.72%.

Which ETF is better, OBOR or KEMQ?

On 5-year performance, OBOR leads with 0.17% vs -4.20% for KEMQ. On fees, KEMQ is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, OBOR has been the lower-risk option at 7.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, OBOR or KEMQ?

Over the 5-year period, OBOR has performed better with a 0.17% return vs -4.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, OBOR or KEMQ?

KEMQ is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for OBOR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, OBOR or KEMQ?

KEMQ has the higher dividend yield at 5.14%, compared with 1.98% for OBOR.

What is the main difference between OBOR and KEMQ?

OBOR tracks MSCI Global China Infrastructure Exposure, while KEMQ tracks Solactive Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for OBOR and 0.60% for KEMQ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

OBOR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.75 vs 0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.