OARK vs. KQQQ
OARK (YieldMax Innovation Option Income Strategy ETF) and KQQQ (Kurv Technology Titans Select ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - OARK is a Options Trading fund actively managed by YieldMax, while KQQQ is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Kurv. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, OARK returned 16.90% vs 34.81% for KQQQ. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.
Performance
OARK vs. KQQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OARK achieves a 3.98% return, which is significantly lower than KQQQ's 14.14% return.
OARK
- 1D
- -1.92%
- 1M
- -0.93%
- YTD
- 3.98%
- 6M
- 0.77%
- 1Y
- 16.90%
- 3Y*
- 13.04%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KQQQ
- 1D
- -2.44%
- 1M
- -1.70%
- YTD
- 14.14%
- 6M
- 13.01%
- 1Y
- 34.81%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OARK vs. KQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
OARK YieldMax Innovation Option Income Strategy ETF | 3.98% | 20.37% | 11.30% |
KQQQ Kurv Technology Titans Select ETF | 14.14% | 16.64% | 11.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between OARK and KQQQ is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2024 | 0.70 |
The correlation between OARK and KQQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OARK vs. KQQQ — Risk / Return Rank
OARK
KQQQ
OARK vs. KQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Innovation Option Income Strategy ETF (OARK) and Kurv Technology Titans Select ETF (KQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| OARK | KQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.31 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.73 | 2.02 | -1.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.70 | 6.56 | -4.86 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
OARK vs. KQQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OARK drawdown since its inception was -35.48%, which is greater than KQQQ's maximum drawdown of -26.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OARK and KQQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OARK | KQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.48% | -26.15% | -9.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.26% | -17.30% | -5.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.48% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.62% | -5.22% | -3.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.54% | -4.69% | -5.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.96% | 5.32% | +4.64% |
Volatility
OARK vs. KQQQ - Volatility Comparison
YieldMax Innovation Option Income Strategy ETF (OARK) has a higher volatility of 9.68% compared to Kurv Technology Titans Select ETF (KQQQ) at 8.05%. This indicates that OARK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OARK | KQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.68% | 8.05% | +1.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.07% | 15.79% | +5.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.55% | 19.45% | +9.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.95% | 23.71% | +7.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.95% | 23.71% | +7.24% |
OARK vs. KQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both OARK and KQQQ have an expense ratio of 0.99%.
Dividends
OARK vs. KQQQ - Dividend Comparison
OARK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 63.14%, more than KQQQ's 14.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
KQQQ Kurv Technology Titans Select ETF | 14.33% | 12.01% | 2.48% | 0.00% |
OARK YieldMax Innovation Option Income Strategy ETF | 63.14% | 61.86% | 47.86% | 45.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OARK and KQQQ have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OARK has higher volatility (9.68%) compared to KQQQ (8.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OARK dropped -35.48% vs KQQQ's -26.15%.
On 1-year performance, KQQQ leads with 34.81% vs 16.90% for OARK. Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. On volatility, KQQQ has been the lower-risk option at 8.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, KQQQ has performed better with a 34.81% return vs 16.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
OARK and KQQQ have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.
OARK has the higher dividend yield at 63.14%, compared with 14.33% for KQQQ.
OARK is categorized as Options Trading, while KQQQ is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Kurv.
KQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OARK and KQQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer