OARK vs. CONY

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about YieldMax Innovation Option Income Strategy ETF (OARK) and YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (CONY).

OARK and CONY are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. OARK is an actively managed fund by YieldMax. It was launched on Nov 22, 2022. CONY is an actively managed fund by YieldMax. It was launched on Aug 14, 2023.

Performance

OARK vs. CONY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax Innovation Option Income Strategy ETF (OARK) and YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (CONY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

OARK vs. CONY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
OARK YieldMax Innovation Option Income Strategy ETF	-6.86%	20.37%	7.32%	9.77%
CONY YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF	-22.28%	-26.34%	23.62%	81.04%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OARK achieves a -6.86% return, which is significantly higher than CONY's -22.28% return.

OARK

• 1D: 1.06%
• 1M: -4.07%
• YTD: -6.86%
• 6M: -13.09%
• 1Y: 32.55%
• 3Y*: 11.19%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CONY

• 1D: -0.65%
• 1M: -4.43%
• YTD: -22.28%
• 6M: -46.53%
• 1Y: -21.95%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OARK vs. CONY - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both OARK and CONY have an expense ratio of 0.99%.

OARK

YieldMax Innovation Option Income Strategy ETF

CONY

YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF

Return for Risk

OARK vs. CONY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OARK

OARK Risk / Return Rank: 50
OARK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
OARK Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
OARK Omega Ratio Rank: 48
OARK Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
OARK Martin Ratio Rank: 38

CONY

CONY Risk / Return Rank: 7
CONY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
CONY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
CONY Omega Ratio Rank: 7
CONY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
CONY Martin Ratio Rank: 7

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OARK vs. CONY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Innovation Option Income Strategy ETF (OARK) and YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (CONY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	OARK	CONY	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.99	-0.37	+1.36
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.50	-0.18	+1.67
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	0.98	+0.21
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.45	-0.33	+1.78
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.71	-0.67	+4.38
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

OARK vs. CONY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OARK Sharpe Ratio is 0.99, which is higher than the CONY Sharpe Ratio of -0.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OARK and CONY, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	OARK	CONY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.99	-0.37	+1.36
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.27	0.16	+0.11

Correlation

The correlation between OARK and CONY is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

OARK vs. CONY - Dividend Comparison

OARK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 65.84%, less than CONY's 213.07% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023
OARK YieldMax Innovation Option Income Strategy ETF	65.84%	61.86%	47.86%	45.03%
CONY YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF	213.07%	192.07%	155.66%	16.43%

Drawdowns

OARK vs. CONY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OARK drawdown since its inception was -35.48%, smaller than the maximum CONY drawdown of -63.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OARK and CONY.

Drawdown Indicators

	OARK	CONY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.48%	-63.57%	+28.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-23.26%	-63.39%	+40.13%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-18.14%	-55.97%	+37.83%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.65%	-20.23%	+9.58%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.11%	31.10%	-21.99%

Volatility

OARK vs. CONY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for YieldMax Innovation Option Income Strategy ETF (OARK) is 10.21%, while YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (CONY) has a volatility of 19.71%. This indicates that OARK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CONY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	OARK	CONY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.21%	19.71%	-9.50%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.13%	44.87%	-22.74%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	32.96%	59.46%	-26.50%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	31.12%	60.49%	-29.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	31.12%	60.49%	-29.37%