OAMZ.DE vs. CCIF
OAMZ.DE (IncomeShares Amazon (AMZN) Options ETP) and CCIF (Carlyle Credit Income Fund) are both funds - OAMZ.DE is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Leverage Shares, while CCIF is a Intermediate Core Bond fund actively managed by Carlyle. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, OAMZ.DE returned -2.15% vs -39.10% for CCIF. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
OAMZ.DE vs. CCIF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
OAMZ.DE is traded in EUR, while CCIF is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CCIF values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OAMZ.DE achieves a -5.56% return, which is significantly higher than CCIF's -27.67% return.
OAMZ.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -6.11%
- YTD
- -5.56%
- 6M
- -4.94%
- 1Y
- -2.15%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CCIF
- 1D
- 1.40%
- 1M
- -5.28%
- YTD
- -27.67%
- 6M
- -26.85%
- 1Y
- -39.10%
- 3Y*
- -18.33%
- 5Y*
- -8.14%
- 10Y*
- —
OAMZ.DE vs. CCIF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
OAMZ.DE IncomeShares Amazon (AMZN) Options ETP | -5.56% | -6.86% | 2.38% |
CCIF Carlyle Credit Income Fund | -27.67% | -36.23% | 1.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between OAMZ.DE and CCIF is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 15, 2024 | 0.14 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OAMZ.DE vs. CCIF — Risk / Return Rank
OAMZ.DE
CCIF
OAMZ.DE vs. CCIF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IncomeShares Amazon (AMZN) Options ETP (OAMZ.DE) and Carlyle Credit Income Fund (CCIF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| OAMZ.DE | CCIF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.99 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 0.77 | +0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.07 | -0.89 | +0.82 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.13 | -1.47 | +1.35 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
OAMZ.DE vs. CCIF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OAMZ.DE drawdown since its inception was -32.66%, smaller than the maximum CCIF drawdown of -56.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OAMZ.DE and CCIF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OAMZ.DE | CCIF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.66% | -56.16% | +23.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.09% | -44.30% | +12.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -56.16% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -56.16% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.04% | -54.45% | +34.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.00% | -13.49% | -2.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.94% | 26.58% | -9.64% |
Volatility
OAMZ.DE vs. CCIF - Volatility Comparison
IncomeShares Amazon (AMZN) Options ETP (OAMZ.DE) has a higher volatility of 9.22% compared to Carlyle Credit Income Fund (CCIF) at 7.31%. This indicates that OAMZ.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CCIF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OAMZ.DE | CCIF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.22% | 7.31% | +1.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.04% | 26.25% | -2.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.43% | 30.95% | +6.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.94% | 21.41% | +13.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.94% | 26.43% | +8.51% |
Dividends
OAMZ.DE vs. CCIF - Dividend Comparison
OAMZ.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.15%, less than CCIF's 44.70% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCIF Carlyle Credit Income Fund | 44.70% | 26.87% | 15.73% | 23.58% | 9.96% | 8.55% | 6.09% | 3.77% |
OAMZ.DE IncomeShares Amazon (AMZN) Options ETP | 16.15% | 14.46% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OAMZ.DE and CCIF have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for OAMZ.DE and CCIF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer