CCIF vs. ECC
CCIF (Carlyle Credit Income Fund) is Intermediate Core Bond fund actively managed by Carlyle, while ECC (Eagle Point Credit Company Inc) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, CCIF returned -8.30%/yr vs -5.30%/yr for ECC. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CCIF vs. ECC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CCIF achieves a -26.99% return, which is significantly lower than ECC's -20.56% return.
CCIF
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- -5.87%
- YTD
- -26.99%
- 6M
- -33.09%
- 1Y
- -40.03%
- 3Y*
- -16.08%
- 5Y*
- -8.30%
- 10Y*
- —
ECC
- 1D
- -1.69%
- 1M
- -2.63%
- YTD
- -20.56%
- 6M
- -26.88%
- 1Y
- -31.83%
- 3Y*
- -9.03%
- 5Y*
- -5.30%
- 10Y*
- 2.69%
CCIF vs. ECC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCIF Carlyle Credit Income Fund | -26.99% | -27.64% | 16.37% | 14.50% | -6.37% | 12.67% | 0.51% | -12.85% |
ECC Eagle Point Credit Company Inc | -20.56% | -18.45% | 11.77% | 12.11% | -11.71% | 56.78% | -21.00% | -8.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between CCIF and ECC is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2019 | 0.19 |
Over the past year, CCIF and ECC have become more correlated (0.46) than their long-term average of 0.19, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CCIF vs. ECC — Risk / Return Rank
CCIF
ECC
CCIF vs. ECC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Carlyle Credit Income Fund (CCIF) and Eagle Point Credit Company Inc (ECC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CCIF | ECC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.34 | -0.93 | -0.41 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.92 | -1.25 | -0.67 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.75 | 0.85 | -0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.93 | -0.70 | -0.24 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.68 | -1.32 | -0.36 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CCIF | ECC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.34 | -0.93 | -0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.41 | -0.22 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.07 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.23 | 0.08 | -0.31 |
Drawdowns
CCIF vs. ECC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CCIF drawdown since its inception was -51.70%, smaller than the maximum ECC drawdown of -70.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCIF and ECC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CCIF | ECC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.70% | -70.79% | +19.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -43.40% | -45.79% | +2.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -51.70% | -49.65% | -2.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -51.70% | -49.65% | -2.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -70.79% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -49.57% | -39.75% | -9.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.71% | -12.91% | +1.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.15% | 24.19% | -0.04% |
Volatility
CCIF vs. ECC - Volatility Comparison
Carlyle Credit Income Fund (CCIF) has a higher volatility of 7.26% compared to Eagle Point Credit Company Inc (ECC) at 5.65%. This indicates that CCIF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ECC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CCIF | ECC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.26% | 5.65% | +1.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.95% | 26.11% | -0.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.91% | 34.40% | -4.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.20% | 24.17% | -3.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.46% | 36.35% | -10.89% |
Dividends
CCIF vs. ECC - Dividend Comparison
CCIF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 36.41%, less than ECC's 37.25% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCIF Carlyle Credit Income Fund | 36.41% | 26.87% | 15.73% | 23.58% | 9.96% | 8.55% | 6.09% | 3.77% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ECC Eagle Point Credit Company Inc | 37.25% | 29.17% | 20.05% | 19.58% | 23.42% | 11.71% | 13.08% | 16.43% | 16.89% | 13.02% | 14.36% | 14.61% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CCIF and ECC have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CCIF has higher volatility (7.26%) compared to ECC (5.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CCIF dropped -51.70% vs ECC's -70.79%.
ECC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.93 vs -1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CCIF and ECC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer