CCIF vs. EIC
CCIF (Carlyle Credit Income Fund) is Intermediate Core Bond fund actively managed by Carlyle, while EIC (Eagle Point Income Company Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, CCIF returned -9.18%/yr vs 4.46%/yr for EIC. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CCIF vs. EIC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CCIF achieves a -30.52% return, which is significantly lower than EIC's -4.14% return.
CCIF
- 1D
- 2.62%
- 1M
- -7.96%
- YTD
- -30.52%
- 6M
- -29.77%
- 1Y
- -39.08%
- 3Y*
- -17.12%
- 5Y*
- -9.18%
- 10Y*
- —
EIC
- 1D
- 1.11%
- 1M
- -2.77%
- YTD
- -4.14%
- 6M
- -4.56%
- 1Y
- -12.70%
- 3Y*
- 6.55%
- 5Y*
- 4.46%
- 10Y*
- —
CCIF vs. EIC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCIF Carlyle Credit Income Fund | -30.52% | -27.64% | 16.37% | 14.50% | -6.37% | 12.67% | 0.51% | 7.73% |
EIC Eagle Point Income Company Inc. | -4.14% | -15.28% | 24.02% | 20.86% | -10.48% | 28.01% | -14.41% | -2.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between CCIF and EIC is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2019 | 0.15 |
Over the past year, CCIF and EIC have become more correlated (0.40) than their long-term average of 0.15, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CCIF vs. EIC — Risk / Return Rank
CCIF
EIC
CCIF vs. EIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Carlyle Credit Income Fund (CCIF) and Eagle Point Income Company Inc. (EIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CCIF | EIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.76 | 0.90 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.87 | -0.44 | -0.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.50 | -0.81 | -0.69 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CCIF vs. EIC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CCIF drawdown since its inception was -53.23%, smaller than the maximum EIC drawdown of -67.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCIF and EIC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CCIF | EIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.23% | -67.08% | +13.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -45.20% | -28.67% | -16.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -53.23% | -34.06% | -19.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.23% | -34.06% | -19.17% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -52.01% | -24.15% | -27.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.00% | -12.33% | +0.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 26.05% | 15.77% | +10.28% |
Volatility
CCIF vs. EIC - Volatility Comparison
Carlyle Credit Income Fund (CCIF) has a higher volatility of 7.44% compared to Eagle Point Income Company Inc. (EIC) at 4.88%. This indicates that CCIF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EIC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CCIF | EIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.44% | 4.88% | +2.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.21% | 14.24% | +11.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.52% | 19.95% | +10.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.35% | 20.28% | +0.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.48% | 37.37% | -11.89% |
Dividends
CCIF vs. EIC - Dividend Comparison
CCIF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 45.02%, more than EIC's 17.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCIF Carlyle Credit Income Fund | 45.02% | 26.87% | 15.73% | 23.58% | 9.96% | 8.55% | 6.09% | 3.77% |
EIC Eagle Point Income Company Inc. | 17.13% | 17.35% | 15.44% | 13.59% | 11.03% | 7.78% | 10.39% | 3.65% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CCIF and EIC have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CCIF has higher volatility (7.44%) compared to EIC (4.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CCIF dropped -53.23% vs EIC's -67.08%.
EIC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.64 vs -1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CCIF and EIC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer