CCIF vs. LSSAX
CCIF (Carlyle Credit Income Fund) and LSSAX (Loomis Sayles Securitized Asset Fund) are both Intermediate Core Bond funds. Over the past 5 years, CCIF returned -7.85%/yr vs 1.18%/yr for LSSAX. Their 0.05 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
CCIF vs. LSSAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CCIF achieves a -27.42% return, which is significantly lower than LSSAX's 0.81% return.
CCIF
- 1D
- 1.82%
- 1M
- 2.21%
- 6M
- -26.29%
- YTD
- -27.42%
- 1Y
- -32.20%
- 3Y*
- -13.25%
- 5Y*
- -7.85%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -5.90%
LSSAX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.76%
- 6M
- 0.30%
- YTD
- 0.81%
- 1Y
- 4.81%
- 3Y*
- 5.73%
- 5Y*
- 1.18%
- 10Y*
- 2.36%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.92%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $341.97K | $279.28K | $351.59K | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
CCIF vs. LSSAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCIF Carlyle Credit Income Fund | -27.42% | -27.64% | 16.37% | 14.50% | -6.37% | 12.67% | 0.51% | -12.85% |
LSSAX Loomis Sayles Securitized Asset Fund | 0.81% | 8.32% | 3.94% | 7.01% | -11.82% | 0.64% | 4.68% | 3.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between CCIF and LSSAX is 0.05, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.05 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2019 | 0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CCIF vs. LSSAX — Risk / Return Rank
CCIF
LSSAX
CCIF vs. LSSAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Carlyle Credit Income Fund (CCIF) and Loomis Sayles Securitized Asset Fund (LSSAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CCIF | LSSAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.80 | 1.26 | -0.46 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.80 | 2.64 | -3.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.28 | 8.13 | -9.41 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CCIF vs. LSSAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CCIF drawdown since its inception was -53.23%, which is greater than LSSAX's maximum drawdown of -16.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCIF and LSSAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CCIF | LSSAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.23% | -16.40% | -36.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -41.95% | -2.16% | -39.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -53.23% | -5.09% | -48.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.23% | -16.31% | -36.92% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -16.40% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -49.87% | -1.30% | -48.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.59% | -1.97% | -10.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 26.03% | 0.67% | +25.36% |
Volatility
CCIF vs. LSSAX - Volatility Comparison
Carlyle Credit Income Fund (CCIF) has a higher volatility of 5.60% compared to Loomis Sayles Securitized Asset Fund (LSSAX) at 1.04%. This indicates that CCIF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LSSAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CCIF | LSSAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.60% | 1.04% | +4.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.36% | 2.89% | +23.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.64% | 3.99% | +25.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.44% | 5.83% | +14.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.39% | 4.44% | +20.95% |
Dividends
CCIF vs. LSSAX - Dividend Comparison
CCIF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 42.45%, more than LSSAX's 4.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCIF Carlyle Credit Income Fund | 42.45% | 26.87% | 15.73% | 23.58% | 9.96% | 8.55% | 6.09% | 3.77% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LSSAX Loomis Sayles Securitized Asset Fund | 4.38% | 4.23% | 4.54% | 5.65% | 6.47% | 6.38% | 5.95% | 5.48% | 5.62% | 5.42% | 5.12% | 5.20% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CCIF and LSSAX have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CCIF has higher volatility (5.60%) compared to LSSAX (1.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CCIF dropped -53.23% vs LSSAX's -16.40%.
LSSAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs -1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CCIF and LSSAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer