CCIF vs. CTEN.DE
CCIF (Carlyle Credit Income Fund) and CTEN.DE (CoinShares Physical Top10 Crypto Market ETP) are both funds - CCIF is a Intermediate Core Bond fund actively managed by Carlyle, while CTEN.DE is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by CoinShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, CCIF returned -16.08%/yr vs 21.12%/yr for CTEN.DE. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CCIF vs. CTEN.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CCIF is traded in USD, while CTEN.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the CTEN.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CCIF achieves a -26.99% return, which is significantly higher than CTEN.DE's -29.86% return.
CCIF
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- -5.87%
- YTD
- -26.99%
- 6M
- -33.09%
- 1Y
- -40.03%
- 3Y*
- -16.08%
- 5Y*
- -8.30%
- 10Y*
- —
CTEN.DE
- 1D
- -5.21%
- 1M
- -14.82%
- YTD
- -29.86%
- 6M
- -34.83%
- 1Y
- -34.93%
- 3Y*
- 21.12%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CCIF vs. CTEN.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CCIF Carlyle Credit Income Fund | -26.99% | -27.64% | 16.37% | -0.45% |
CTEN.DE CoinShares Physical Top10 Crypto Market ETP | -29.86% | -9.05% | 85.27% | 57.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between CCIF and CTEN.DE is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2023 | 0.10 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CCIF vs. CTEN.DE — Risk / Return Rank
CCIF
CTEN.DE
CCIF vs. CTEN.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Carlyle Credit Income Fund (CCIF) and CoinShares Physical Top10 Crypto Market ETP (CTEN.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CCIF | CTEN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.34 | -0.66 | -0.68 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.92 | -0.78 | -1.13 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.75 | 0.92 | -0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.93 | -0.58 | -0.35 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.68 | -0.98 | -0.70 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CCIF | CTEN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.34 | -0.66 | -0.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.41 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.23 | 0.41 | -0.65 |
Drawdowns
CCIF vs. CTEN.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CCIF drawdown since its inception was -51.70%, smaller than the maximum CTEN.DE drawdown of -56.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCIF and CTEN.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CCIF | CTEN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.70% | -56.05% | +4.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -43.40% | -56.05% | +12.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -51.70% | -56.05% | +4.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -51.70% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -49.57% | -55.11% | +5.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.71% | -18.81% | +7.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.15% | 33.64% | -9.49% |
Volatility
CCIF vs. CTEN.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Carlyle Credit Income Fund (CCIF) is 7.26%, while CoinShares Physical Top10 Crypto Market ETP (CTEN.DE) has a volatility of 10.38%. This indicates that CCIF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CTEN.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CCIF | CTEN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.26% | 10.38% | -3.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.95% | 35.34% | -9.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.91% | 49.49% | -19.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.20% | 51.88% | -31.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.46% | 51.88% | -26.42% |
Dividends
CCIF vs. CTEN.DE - Dividend Comparison
CCIF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 36.41%, while CTEN.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCIF Carlyle Credit Income Fund | 36.41% | 26.87% | 15.73% | 23.58% | 9.96% | 8.55% | 6.09% | 3.77% |
CTEN.DE CoinShares Physical Top10 Crypto Market ETP | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CCIF and CTEN.DE have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for CCIF and CTEN.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer