OAKG vs. NXTE
OAKG (Oakmark Global Large Cap ETF) and NXTE (Axs Green Alpha ETF) are both Global Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. OAKG charges 0.62%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for NXTE.
Performance
OAKG vs. NXTE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OAKG achieves a -2.33% return, which is significantly lower than NXTE's 24.43% return.
OAKG
- 1D
- -1.16%
- 1M
- -0.56%
- YTD
- -2.33%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NXTE
- 1D
- -7.95%
- 1M
- 3.56%
- YTD
- 24.43%
- 6M
- 22.91%
- 1Y
- 47.39%
- 3Y*
- 14.79%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OAKG vs. NXTE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
OAKG Oakmark Global Large Cap ETF | -2.33% | -0.00% |
NXTE Axs Green Alpha ETF | 24.43% | -3.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between OAKG and NXTE is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2025 | 0.61 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OAKG vs. NXTE — Risk / Return Rank
OAKG
NXTE
OAKG vs. NXTE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Oakmark Global Large Cap ETF (OAKG) and Axs Green Alpha ETF (NXTE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OAKG | NXTE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.96 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.32 | 0.55 | -0.88 |
Drawdowns
OAKG vs. NXTE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OAKG drawdown since its inception was -11.52%, smaller than the maximum NXTE drawdown of -28.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OAKG and NXTE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OAKG | NXTE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.52% | -28.64% | +17.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -13.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -27.24% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.94% | -9.15% | +3.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.17% | -7.88% | +3.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.30% | — |
Volatility
OAKG vs. NXTE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OAKG | NXTE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 12.46% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 21.10% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.02% | 25.84% | -10.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.02% | 26.30% | -11.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.02% | 26.30% | -11.28% |
OAKG vs. NXTE - Expense Ratio Comparison
OAKG has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is lower than NXTE's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
OAKG vs. NXTE - Dividend Comparison
OAKG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%, less than NXTE's 0.40% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NXTE Axs Green Alpha ETF | 0.40% | 0.36% | 0.52% | 0.76% | 0.13% |
OAKG Oakmark Global Large Cap ETF | 0.04% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OAKG and NXTE have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, OAKG is cheaper at 0.62% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
OAKG is cheaper with a 0.62% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for NXTE.
NXTE has the higher dividend yield at 0.40%, compared with 0.04% for OAKG.
They also come from different issuers: Oakmark and AXS. Their fees differ too: 0.62% for OAKG and 1.00% for NXTE.
Find the right allocation for OAKG and NXTE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer