OAKG vs. OAKM
OAKG (Oakmark Global Large Cap ETF) and OAKM (Oakmark U.S. Large Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - OAKG is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Oakmark, while OAKM is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Oakmark. Both are actively managed. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. OAKG charges 0.62%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for OAKM.
Performance
OAKG vs. OAKM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OAKG achieves a -2.33% return, which is significantly lower than OAKM's -0.44% return.
OAKG
- 1D
- -1.16%
- 1M
- -0.56%
- YTD
- -2.33%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OAKM
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- 0.95%
- YTD
- -0.44%
- 6M
- 1.60%
- 1Y
- 13.85%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OAKG vs. OAKM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
OAKG Oakmark Global Large Cap ETF | -2.33% | -0.00% |
OAKM Oakmark U.S. Large Cap ETF | -0.44% | -0.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between OAKG and OAKM is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2025 | 0.73 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OAKG vs. OAKM — Risk / Return Rank
OAKG
OAKM
OAKG vs. OAKM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Oakmark Global Large Cap ETF (OAKG) and Oakmark U.S. Large Cap ETF (OAKM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OAKG | OAKM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.21 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.32 | 0.60 | -0.92 |
Drawdowns
OAKG vs. OAKM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OAKG drawdown since its inception was -11.52%, smaller than the maximum OAKM drawdown of -15.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OAKG and OAKM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OAKG | OAKM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.52% | -15.24% | +3.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.19% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.94% | -2.91% | -3.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.17% | -2.77% | -1.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.77% | — |
Volatility
OAKG vs. OAKM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OAKG | OAKM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.57% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.45% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.02% | 13.10% | +1.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.02% | 16.54% | -1.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.02% | 16.54% | -1.52% |
OAKG vs. OAKM - Expense Ratio Comparison
OAKG has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is higher than OAKM's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
OAKG vs. OAKM - Dividend Comparison
OAKG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%, less than OAKM's 0.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
OAKG Oakmark Global Large Cap ETF | 0.04% | 0.04% | 0.00% |
OAKM Oakmark U.S. Large Cap ETF | 0.67% | 0.67% | 0.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OAKG and OAKM have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, OAKM is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
OAKM is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.62% for OAKG.
OAKM has the higher dividend yield at 0.67%, compared with 0.04% for OAKG.
OAKG is categorized as Global Equities, while OAKM is Large Cap Value Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.62% for OAKG and 0.59% for OAKM.
Find the right allocation for OAKG and OAKM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer