PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OAKG vs. BDVL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OAKG vs. BDVL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Oakmark Global Large Cap ETF (OAKG) and iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF (BDVL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OAKG achieves a -2.33% return, which is significantly lower than BDVL's 3.52% return.


OAKG

1D
-1.16%
1M
-0.56%
YTD
-2.33%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BDVL

1D
-1.52%
1M
-1.29%
YTD
3.52%
6M
3.81%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OAKG vs. BDVL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between OAKG and BDVL is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2025

0.77

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OAKG vs. BDVL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Oakmark Global Large Cap ETF (OAKG) and iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF (BDVL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

OAKG vs. BDVL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


OAKGBDVLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.32

0.81

-1.13

Drawdowns

OAKG vs. BDVL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OAKG drawdown since its inception was -11.52%, which is greater than BDVL's maximum drawdown of -7.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OAKG and BDVL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OAKGBDVLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.52%

-7.71%

-3.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.94%

-2.08%

-3.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.17%

-1.19%

-2.98%

Volatility

OAKG vs. BDVL - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OAKGBDVLDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.02%

9.62%

+5.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.02%

9.62%

+5.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.02%

9.62%

+5.40%

OAKG vs. BDVL - Expense Ratio Comparison

OAKG has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is higher than BDVL's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

OAKG vs. BDVL - Dividend Comparison

OAKG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%, less than BDVL's 2.70% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


OAKG and BDVL have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BDVL is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BDVL is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.62% for OAKG.

BDVL has the higher dividend yield at 2.70%, compared with 0.04% for OAKG.

They also come from different issuers: Oakmark and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.62% for OAKG and 0.40% for BDVL.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OAKG and BDVL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer