PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NZUS vs. OUSA
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

NZUS vs. OUSA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI USA Climate Paris Aligned ETF (NZUS) and OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF (OUSA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

NZUS vs. OUSA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
NZUS
SPDR MSCI USA Climate Paris Aligned ETF
-8.31%13.95%24.34%29.16%-14.34%
OUSA
OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF
-3.17%10.23%17.09%13.44%-3.50%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NZUS achieves a -8.31% return, which is significantly lower than OUSA's -3.17% return.


NZUS

1D
3.30%
1M
-4.09%
YTD
-8.31%
6M
-6.15%
1Y
12.87%
3Y*
15.43%
5Y*
10Y*

OUSA

1D
1.44%
1M
-6.28%
YTD
-3.17%
6M
-0.83%
1Y
6.15%
3Y*
11.51%
5Y*
8.66%
10Y*
9.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


NZUS vs. OUSA - Expense Ratio Comparison

NZUS has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than OUSA's 0.48% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

NZUS vs. OUSA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NZUS
NZUS Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
NZUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NZUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
NZUS Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
NZUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
NZUS Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

OUSA
OUSA Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
OUSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OUSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
OUSA Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
OUSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
OUSA Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NZUS vs. OUSA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI USA Climate Paris Aligned ETF (NZUS) and OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF (OUSA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NZUSOUSADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.66

0.45

+0.21

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.10

0.74

+0.35

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.10

+0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.09

0.75

+0.33

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.76

3.10

+0.66

NZUS vs. OUSA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NZUS Sharpe Ratio is 0.66, which is higher than the OUSA Sharpe Ratio of 0.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NZUS and OUSA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NZUSOUSADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

0.45

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.66

-0.15

Correlation

The correlation between NZUS and OUSA is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

NZUS vs. OUSA - Dividend Comparison

NZUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, less than OUSA's 1.46% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NZUS
SPDR MSCI USA Climate Paris Aligned ETF
0.98%0.89%5.49%1.07%1.22%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
OUSA
OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF
1.46%1.39%1.50%1.81%1.92%1.56%2.03%2.31%3.06%2.15%2.32%1.17%

Drawdowns

NZUS vs. OUSA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NZUS drawdown since its inception was -20.99%, smaller than the maximum OUSA drawdown of -33.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NZUS and OUSA.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


NZUSOUSADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.99%

-33.12%

+12.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.44%

-9.80%

-2.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.54%

-6.65%

-2.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.93%

-3.53%

-1.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.59%

2.39%

+1.20%

Volatility

NZUS vs. OUSA - Volatility Comparison

SPDR MSCI USA Climate Paris Aligned ETF (NZUS) has a higher volatility of 5.76% compared to OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF (OUSA) at 3.78%. This indicates that NZUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OUSA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


NZUSOUSADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.76%

3.78%

+1.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.42%

7.27%

+3.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.57%

13.88%

+5.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.78%

13.31%

+5.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.78%

15.15%

+3.63%