PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NZAC vs. IDV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NZAC vs. IDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF (NZAC) and iShares International Select Dividend ETF (IDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NZAC achieves a 9.73% return, which is significantly lower than IDV's 12.32% return. Over the past 10 years, NZAC has outperformed IDV with an annualized return of 12.25%, while IDV has yielded a comparatively lower 10.28% annualized return.


NZAC

1D
0.56%
1M
5.35%
YTD
9.73%
6M
10.42%
1Y
25.77%
3Y*
19.38%
5Y*
10.26%
10Y*
12.25%

IDV

1D
-1.09%
1M
0.90%
YTD
12.32%
6M
15.21%
1Y
36.98%
3Y*
25.10%
5Y*
11.95%
10Y*
10.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NZAC vs. IDV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NZAC
SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF
9.73%20.55%16.67%23.22%-19.77%18.35%17.21%28.24%-9.80%22.93%
IDV
iShares International Select Dividend ETF
12.32%52.16%4.00%10.32%-6.40%12.00%-5.94%23.56%-10.37%19.74%

Correlation

The correlation between NZAC and IDV is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 28, 2014

0.69

The correlation between NZAC and IDV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

NZAC vs. IDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
NZAC
IDV

Technology

34.3%
0.9%

Financial Services

13.1%
30.1%

Communication Services

8.5%
10.0%

Consumer Cyclical

8.2%
9.6%

Healthcare

7.8%

-

Industrials

7.3%
6.7%

Real Estate

5.2%
2.4%

Basic Materials

1.9%
5.8%

Utilities

1.4%
11.8%

Energy

1.2%
15.6%

Consumer Defensive

1.0%
7.2%

Technology

NZAC
34.3%
IDV
0.9%

Financial Services

NZAC
13.1%
IDV
30.1%

Communication Services

NZAC
8.5%
IDV
10.0%

Consumer Cyclical

NZAC
8.2%
IDV
9.6%

Healthcare

NZAC
7.8%
IDV

-

Industrials

NZAC
7.3%
IDV
6.7%

Real Estate

NZAC
5.2%
IDV
2.4%

Basic Materials

NZAC
1.9%
IDV
5.8%

Utilities

NZAC
1.4%
IDV
11.8%

Energy

NZAC
1.2%
IDV
15.6%

Consumer Defensive

NZAC
1.0%
IDV
7.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NZAC vs. IDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NZAC
NZAC Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
NZAC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NZAC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
NZAC Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
NZAC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
NZAC Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

IDV
IDV Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
IDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDV Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
IDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDV Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NZAC vs. IDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF (NZAC) and iShares International Select Dividend ETF (IDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NZACIDVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.03

2.90

-0.87

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.85

3.75

-0.90

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.52

-0.16

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.60

4.36

-1.77

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.27

16.67

-5.40

NZAC vs. IDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NZAC Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is comparable to the IDV Sharpe Ratio of 2.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NZAC and IDV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NZACIDVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.03

2.90

-0.87

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

0.77

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

0.58

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

0.22

+0.40

Drawdowns

NZAC vs. IDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NZAC drawdown since its inception was -33.72%, smaller than the maximum IDV drawdown of -70.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NZAC and IDV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NZACIDVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.72%

-70.14%

+36.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.10%

-8.52%

-1.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.19%

-11.86%

-4.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.31%

-29.19%

+0.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.72%

-42.50%

+8.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.80%

+2.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.32%

-15.40%

+10.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.32%

2.22%

+0.10%

Volatility

NZAC vs. IDV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF (NZAC) is 3.66%, while iShares International Select Dividend ETF (IDV) has a volatility of 4.32%. This indicates that NZAC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NZACIDVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.66%

4.32%

-0.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.33%

10.60%

-0.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.91%

12.85%

+0.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.81%

15.54%

+1.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.14%

17.94%

-0.80%

NZAC vs. IDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

NZAC has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than IDV's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

NZAC vs. IDV - Dividend Comparison

NZAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.02%, less than IDV's 4.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IDV
iShares International Select Dividend ETF
4.45%4.94%6.46%6.51%7.33%5.78%5.47%5.15%5.93%4.52%4.69%5.08%
NZAC
SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF
2.02%1.90%1.88%1.65%1.81%1.62%1.59%2.17%2.53%2.20%2.00%2.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


NZAC and IDV have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IDV has higher volatility (4.32%) compared to NZAC (3.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NZAC dropped -33.72% vs IDV's -70.14%.

On 10-year performance, NZAC leads with 12.25% vs 10.28% for IDV. On fees, NZAC is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, NZAC has been the lower-risk option at 3.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, NZAC has performed better with a 12.25% return vs 10.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NZAC is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for IDV.

IDV has the higher dividend yield at 4.45%, compared with 2.02% for NZAC.

NZAC tracks MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned Index, while IDV tracks Dow Jones EPAC Select Dividend. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for NZAC and 0.49% for IDV.

IDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.90 vs 2.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NZAC and IDV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer