NZAC vs. GLOF

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF (NZAC) and iShares Global Equity Factor ETF (GLOF).

NZAC and GLOF are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. NZAC is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned Index. It was launched on Nov 25, 2014. GLOF is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the STOXX Global Equity Factor Index. It was launched on Apr 28, 2005. Both NZAC and GLOF are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

NZAC vs. GLOF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF (NZAC) and iShares Global Equity Factor ETF (GLOF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

NZAC vs. GLOF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
NZAC SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF	-5.23%	20.55%	16.67%	23.22%	-19.77%	18.35%	17.21%	28.24%	-9.80%	22.93%
GLOF iShares Global Equity Factor ETF	-1.25%	23.92%	17.49%	22.38%	-16.97%	18.68%	10.00%	23.21%	-13.70%	29.86%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NZAC achieves a -5.23% return, which is significantly lower than GLOF's -1.25% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with NZAC having a 10.82% annualized return and GLOF not far ahead at 10.98%.

NZAC

• 1D: 3.15%
• 1M: -5.91%
• YTD: -5.23%
• 6M: -2.63%
• 1Y: 17.22%
• 3Y*: 15.04%
• 5Y*: 8.05%
• 10Y*: 10.82%

GLOF

• 1D: 2.86%
• 1M: -5.68%
• YTD: -1.25%
• 6M: 1.91%
• 1Y: 23.93%
• 3Y*: 18.44%
• 5Y*: 9.66%
• 10Y*: 10.98%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NZAC vs. GLOF - Expense Ratio Comparison

NZAC has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than GLOF's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

GLOF

iShares Global Equity Factor ETF

NZAC

SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF

Return for Risk

NZAC vs. GLOF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NZAC

NZAC Risk / Return Rank: 61
NZAC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
NZAC Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
NZAC Omega Ratio Rank: 59
NZAC Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
NZAC Martin Ratio Rank: 67

GLOF

GLOF Risk / Return Rank: 81
GLOF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
GLOF Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
GLOF Omega Ratio Rank: 81
GLOF Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
GLOF Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NZAC vs. GLOF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF (NZAC) and iShares Global Equity Factor ETF (GLOF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NZAC	GLOF	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.97	1.41	-0.45
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.51	2.06	-0.54
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.31	-0.09
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.59	2.10	-0.51
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.70	9.99	-3.29
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NZAC vs. GLOF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NZAC Sharpe Ratio is 0.97, which is lower than the GLOF Sharpe Ratio of 1.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NZAC and GLOF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NZAC	GLOF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.97	1.41	-0.45
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.48	0.62	-0.14
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.64	0.64	-0.01
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.54	0.53	+0.02

Correlation

The correlation between NZAC and GLOF is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

NZAC vs. GLOF - Dividend Comparison

NZAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.01%, more than GLOF's 1.72% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NZAC SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF	2.01%	1.90%	1.88%	1.65%	1.81%	1.62%	1.59%	2.17%	2.53%	2.20%	2.00%	2.40%
GLOF iShares Global Equity Factor ETF	1.72%	1.70%	2.59%	2.51%	2.53%	1.90%	1.73%	2.41%	2.03%	1.94%	1.94%	0.92%

Drawdowns

NZAC vs. GLOF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NZAC drawdown since its inception was -33.72%, roughly equal to the maximum GLOF drawdown of -34.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NZAC and GLOF.

Drawdown Indicators

	NZAC	GLOF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.72%	-34.12%	+0.40%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.85%	-11.32%	+0.47%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.31%	-25.15%	-3.16%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.72%	-34.12%	+0.40%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.27%	-6.45%	-0.82%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.39%	-6.20%	+0.81%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.57%	2.38%	+0.19%

Volatility

NZAC vs. GLOF - Volatility Comparison

SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF (NZAC) and iShares Global Equity Factor ETF (GLOF) have volatilities of 6.18% and 6.12%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NZAC	GLOF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.18%	6.12%	+0.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.07%	9.81%	+0.26%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.91%	17.01%	+0.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.73%	15.63%	+1.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.09%	17.12%	-0.03%