PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NYT vs. ALLY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NYT vs. ALLY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The New York Times Company (NYT) and Ally Financial Inc. (ALLY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NYT achieves a 4.39% return, which is significantly higher than ALLY's 2.03% return. Over the past 10 years, NYT has outperformed ALLY with an annualized return of 20.92%, while ALLY has yielded a comparatively lower 14.26% annualized return.


NYT

1D
-1.34%
1M
-3.84%
YTD
4.39%
6M
2.76%
1Y
33.85%
3Y*
25.63%
5Y*
12.25%
10Y*
20.92%

ALLY

1D
0.18%
1M
7.60%
YTD
2.03%
6M
-0.44%
1Y
27.06%
3Y*
24.07%
5Y*
1.37%
10Y*
14.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NYT vs. ALLY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NYT
The New York Times Company
4.39%35.06%7.33%52.60%-32.16%-6.18%61.92%45.26%21.35%40.50%
ALLY
Ally Financial Inc.
2.03%29.92%6.37%49.22%-46.89%36.04%20.56%37.94%-20.67%56.05%

Correlation

The correlation between NYT and ALLY is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 10, 2014

0.34

The correlation between NYT and ALLY shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (1 year) to 0.36 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NYT:

$11.80B

ALLY:

$14.27B

EPS

NYT:

$2.33

ALLY:

$4.45

PE Ratio

NYT:

30.96

ALLY:

10.23

PS Ratio

NYT:

4.08

ALLY:

0.91

PB Ratio

NYT:

5.90

ALLY:

1.07

Total Revenue (TTM)

NYT:

$2.90B

ALLY:

$15.65B

Gross Profit (TTM)

NYT:

$1.49B

ALLY:

$7.65B

EBITDA (TTM)

NYT:

$573.11M

ALLY:

$2.77B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NYT vs. ALLY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NYT
NYT Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
NYT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NYT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
NYT Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
NYT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
NYT Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

ALLY
ALLY Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
ALLY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALLY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALLY Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
ALLY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALLY Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NYT vs. ALLY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The New York Times Company (NYT) and Ally Financial Inc. (ALLY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NYTALLYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.18

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.12

1.18

+0.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.26

2.91

+2.35

NYT vs. ALLY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NYT Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is comparable to the ALLY Sharpe Ratio of 0.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NYT and ALLY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NYT vs. ALLY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NYT drawdown since its inception was -92.09%, which is greater than ALLY's maximum drawdown of -66.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NYT and ALLY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NYTALLYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.09%

-66.24%

-25.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.05%

-23.04%

+6.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.67%

-31.60%

+11.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.83%

-58.08%

+8.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.93%

-66.24%

+16.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.05%

-4.30%

-11.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.17%

-20.32%

-11.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.45%

9.32%

-2.87%

Volatility

NYT vs. ALLY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for The New York Times Company (NYT) is 6.01%, while Ally Financial Inc. (ALLY) has a volatility of 8.43%. This indicates that NYT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ALLY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NYTALLYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.01%

8.43%

-2.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.61%

22.02%

-2.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.83%

29.87%

-1.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.42%

38.52%

-9.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.75%

39.57%

-8.82%

Dividends

NYT vs. ALLY - Dividend Comparison

NYT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.07%, less than ALLY's 2.63% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ALLY
Ally Financial Inc.
2.63%2.65%3.33%3.44%4.91%1.85%2.13%2.23%2.47%1.37%0.84%0.00%
NYT
The New York Times Company
1.07%0.97%0.96%0.86%1.05%0.56%0.44%0.59%0.72%0.86%1.20%1.19%

Financials

NYT vs. ALLY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The New York Times Company and Ally Financial Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B20222023202420252026
712.24M
3.89B
(NYT) Total Revenue
(ALLY) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

NYT vs. ALLY - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between The New York Times Company and Ally Financial Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
49.0%
49.0%
Portfolio components
NYT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The New York Times Company reported a gross profit of 349.30M and revenue of 712.24M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.0%.

ALLY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ally Financial Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.90B and revenue of 3.89B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.0%.

NYT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The New York Times Company reported an operating income of 90.62M and revenue of 712.24M, resulting in an operating margin of 12.7%.

ALLY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ally Financial Inc. reported an operating income of 400.00M and revenue of 3.89B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.3%.

NYT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The New York Times Company reported a net income of 87.92M and revenue of 712.24M, resulting in a net margin of 12.3%.

ALLY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ally Financial Inc. reported a net income of 319.00M and revenue of 3.89B, resulting in a net margin of 8.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


NYT and ALLY have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ALLY has higher volatility (8.43%) compared to NYT (6.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NYT dropped -92.09% vs ALLY's -66.24%.

NYT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.18 vs 0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NYT and ALLY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer